From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: kvm crash on 5.7-rc1 and later
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 20:21:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200711182158.GF597537@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9178ae3e-db32-c64b-7caf-737f3bc3ba8e@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:15:31AM -0400, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> I am observing a 100% reproducible kvm crash on kernels starting with
> 5.7-rc1, always with the same opcode 0000.
> It happens during wake up from the host suspended state. Worked OK on 5.6
> and older.
> The host is based on Debian testing, Thinkpad T440, i5 cpu.
>
> [ 61.576664] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:387!
> [ 61.576672] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> [ 61.576678] CPU: 0 PID: 3851 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 5.7-pingu
> #0
> [ 61.576680] Hardware name: LENOVO 20B6005JUS/20B6005JUS, BIOS GJETA4WW
> (2.54 ) 03/27/2020
> [ 61.576700] RIP: 0010:kvm_spurious_fault+0xa/0x10 [kvm]
>
> Crash results in a dead kvm and occasionally a very unstable system.
>
> Bisecting the problem between v5.6 and v5.7-rc1 points to
>
> commit 6650cdd9a8ccf00555dbbe743d58541ad8feb6a7
> Author: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Sun Jan 26 12:05:35 2020 -0800
>
> x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel
>
> Reversing that patch seems to actually "cure" the issue.
>
> The problem is present in all kernels past 5.7-rc1, however the patch is not
> reversing directly in later source trees, so can not retest the logic on
> recent kernels.
>
> Peter, would you have idea how to debug that (or even better - would you
> happen to know the fix)?
>
> I have attached dmesg logs from a "good" 5.6.9 kernel, and then "bad" 5.7.0
> and 5.8-rc3
I have no clue about kvm. Nor do I actually have hardware with SLD on.
I've Cc'ed a bunch of folks who might have more ideas.
next parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-11 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <9178ae3e-db32-c64b-7caf-737f3bc3ba8e@gmail.com>
2020-07-11 18:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-07-12 6:27 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-07-12 11:54 ` Woody Suwalski
2020-07-12 15:26 ` Woody Suwalski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200711182158.GF597537@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=terraluna977@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome