From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A37C433E0 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DCE206D8 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726583AbgGXM0g (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:26:36 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:59050 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726258AbgGXM0g (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:26:36 -0400 Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7BF3346A; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:26:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:26:33 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Will Deacon Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iommu/arm-smmu: Updates for 5.9 Message-ID: <20200724122632.GS27672@8bytes.org> References: <20200721080352.GA13023@willie-the-truck> <20200722133323.GG27672@8bytes.org> <20200724115109.GA17451@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200724115109.GA17451@willie-the-truck> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Will, On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:51:09PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Sure, that makes sense to me: I've included a diff below in case anybody > has comments. I've tackled it slightly differently to how the intel and > amd drivers are handled, since we have a header file (arm-smmu.h) which > is shared by a couple of different drivers. I've also moved the v3 driver > under the arm/ directory as Jean Philippe plans to split out the SVA work > for 5.10. > > I'll send a second pull early next week if there are no objections (or > you can pick this patch directly). Thanks, the diff looks fine to me. Joerg