From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@gmx.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kernel/trace: Remove function callback casts
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:53:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200727095306.7f369949@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200726155148.GA9341@ubuntu>
On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 17:52:42 +0200
Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@gmx.com> wrote:
> > If I try to do this I will need some help. Some info that point me to the
> > right direction would be greatly appreciated. Some advice about what
> > functions I will need to implement would be really helpfull. Or point me
> > to the right piece of code that I can pick as base point.
>
> I've been searching and reading the code as much as possible. I've found
> two patches that I think can be useful to guide me. One [1] adds support
> for ftrace_ops to the riscv architecture. The other one [2] adds support
> for ftrace_ops to the parisc architecture.
>
> [1] commit 71e736a7d655 ("riscv/ftrace: Add ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS support")
> [2] commit d562aca37a54 ("parisc/ftrace: Add ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS support")
>
> Due to powerpc arch calls the needed functions from assembly, I based my
> idea on the patch for the RISCV arch.
>
> Can something like the following work?
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index bc76970b6ee5..1c51ff5afae1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -61,9 +61,8 @@ struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
> };
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> #define ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS 1
> -#endif
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER */
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_32.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_32.S
> index e023ae59c429..e69a4e945986 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_32.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_32.S
> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ _GLOBAL(ftrace_caller)
> MCOUNT_SAVE_FRAME
> /* r3 ends up with link register */
> subi r3, r3, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE
> +
> + /* Set ftrace_ops (r5) to the global variable function_trace_op */
> + /* Set pt_regs (r6) to NULL */
> +
> .globl ftrace_call
> ftrace_call:
> bl ftrace_stub
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_pg.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_pg.S
> index 6708e24db0ab..a741448b1df9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_pg.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_pg.S
> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ _GLOBAL_TOC(ftrace_caller)
> std r3, 128(r1)
> ld r4, 16(r11)
> subi r3, r3, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE
> +
> + /* Set ftrace_ops (r5) to the global variable function_trace_op */
> + /* Set pt_regs (r6) to NULL */
I'm guessing you are going to do the above here. If so, this looks correct.
> +
> .globl ftrace_call
> ftrace_call:
> bl ftrace_stub
>
> To add support for ftrace_ops to the powerpc architecture is only necessary
> to fill the r5 and r6 registers before the call to ftrace_stub in all the
> cases. The register r5 is a pointer to ftrace_ops struct and the register
> r6 is a pointer to pt_regs struct. These registers are the third and fourth
> parameters of a function with the following prototype. The first and second
> ones are yet set.
I guess you mean that the first and second ones are already set. But,
yeah, you are on the correct path here!
>
> void func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct pt_regs *regs);
>
> Am I in the right direction? or am I totally wrong?
No, you don't look wrong. But the true test is to try it out :-)
Don't forget to update ftrace_32.S as well.
>
> Thanks for your time and patience.
My pleasure. Thanks for doing this. The more people that understand all
this, the better!
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-27 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-19 15:50 [PATCH v2 0/2] " Oscar Carter
2020-07-19 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel/trace: Prepare to remove " Oscar Carter
2020-07-19 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kernel/trace: Remove " Oscar Carter
2020-07-21 18:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-24 16:19 ` Oscar Carter
2020-07-24 16:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-24 17:14 ` Oscar Carter
2020-07-24 17:24 ` Oscar Carter
2020-07-24 17:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-24 17:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-24 17:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-24 17:55 ` Oscar Carter
2020-07-24 18:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-25 15:09 ` Oscar Carter
2020-07-25 15:19 ` Oscar Carter
2020-07-26 15:52 ` Oscar Carter
2020-07-27 13:53 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-07-31 14:41 ` Oscar Carter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200727095306.7f369949@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oscar.carter@gmx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®