mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] printk: store instead of processing cont parts
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:03:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200729020355.GA1534750@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ft9kx6er.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>

On (20/07/21 17:03), John Ogness wrote:
> On 2020-07-21, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> That said, we have traditionally used not just "current process", but
> >> also "last irq-level" as the context information, so I do think it
> >> would be good to continue to do that.
> >
> > OK, so basically, extending printk_caller_id() so that for IRQ/NMI
> > we will have more info than just "0x80000000 + raw_smp_processor_id()".
> 
> If bit31 is set, the upper 8 bits could specify what the lower 24 bits
> represent. That would give some freedom for the future.
> 
> For example:
> 
> 0x80 = cpu id (generic context)
> 0x81 = interrupt number
> 0x82 = cpu id (nmi context)

Looks good to me. I'd probably add in_softirq state. So the contexts
are: in_task, in_softirq, in_irq, in_nmi

For the purpose of future extensions, I would probably consider
u64 for callerid. So that we can store more "state bits" in the future,
like disabled/enabled preemption; disabled/enabled local irqs; etc.

	-ss

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-29  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-17 23:48 [PATCH 0/4] printk: reimplement LOG_CONT handling John Ogness
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records John Ogness
2020-07-20 14:49   ` John Ogness
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] printk: store instead of processing cont parts John Ogness
2020-07-19 14:35   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-19 18:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-20  1:50       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-20 18:30         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-21  3:53           ` Joe Perches
2020-07-21 14:42           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-21 14:57             ` John Ogness
2020-07-29  2:03               ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2020-07-21 15:40             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-28  2:22               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: process cont records during reading John Ogness
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] ipconfig: cleanup printk usage John Ogness
2020-07-18  0:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] printk: reimplement LOG_CONT handling Linus Torvalds
2020-07-18 14:42   ` John Ogness
2020-07-18 17:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-11 16:05     ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-12 16:39       ` POC: Alternative solution: " Petr Mladek
2020-08-13  0:24         ` John Ogness
2020-08-13  5:18           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-13  7:44             ` John Ogness
2020-08-13  8:41               ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-13 10:29                 ` John Ogness
2020-08-13 11:30                   ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-14  3:34                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-14  8:16                     ` John Ogness
2020-08-14  9:12                       ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-13 11:54                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-14  9:04                   ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-14 22:46                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-14 23:52                     ` Joe Perches
2020-08-15  2:33                       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-15  3:08                         ` Joe Perches
2020-08-15  9:25                       ` David Laight
2020-08-15  5:41                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-13  7:51             ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-13  7:31           ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200729020355.GA1534750@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®