From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the init tree with the block tree
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 19:53:42 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200803195342.781987c3@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200717194221.146ab662@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1954 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:42:21 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the init tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/md/md.c
>
> between commit:
>
> a564e23f0f99 ("md: switch to ->check_events for media change notifications")
>
> from the block tree and commit:
>
> 7e0adbfc20c5 ("md: rewrite md_setup_drive to avoid ioctls")
>
> from the init tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc drivers/md/md.c
> index 5b6d46741baa,ee622b67424e..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@@ -7836,21 -7790,23 +7820,21 @@@ static void md_release(struct gendisk *
> mddev_put(mddev);
> }
>
> -static int md_media_changed(struct gendisk *disk)
> -{
> - struct mddev *mddev = disk->private_data;
> -
> - return mddev->changed;
> -}
> -
> -static int md_revalidate(struct gendisk *disk)
> +static unsigned int md_check_events(struct gendisk *disk, unsigned int clearing)
> {
> struct mddev *mddev = disk->private_data;
> + unsigned int ret = 0;
>
> + if (mddev->changed)
> + ret = DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE;
> mddev->changed = 0;
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
> +
> - static const struct block_device_operations md_fops =
> + const struct block_device_operations md_fops =
> {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .submit_bio = md_submit_bio,
> .open = md_open,
> .release = md_release,
> .ioctl = md_ioctl,
This is now a conflict between the block tree and the vfs tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-03 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-17 9:42 Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-03 9:53 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-08-04 2:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200803195342.781987c3@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®