From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com,
casey@schaufler-ca.com, jmorris@namei.org,
kaleshsingh@google.com, dancol@dancol.org, surenb@google.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nnk@google.com, jeffv@google.com, calin@google.com,
kernel-team@android.com, yanfei.xu@windriver.com,
syzbot+75867c44841cb6373570@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Userfaultfd: Avoid double free of userfault_ctx and remove O_CLOEXEC
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 21:08:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200805040806.GB1136@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200805034758.lrobunwdcqtknsvz@yavin.dot.cyphar.com>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 01:47:58PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> On 2020-08-04, Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> wrote:
> > when get_unused_fd_flags returns error, ctx will be freed by
> > userfaultfd's release function, which is indirectly called by fput().
> > Also, if anon_inode_getfile_secure() returns an error, then
> > userfaultfd_ctx_put() is called, which calls mmdrop() and frees ctx.
> >
> > Also, the O_CLOEXEC was inadvertently added to the call to
> > get_unused_fd_flags() [1].
>
> I disagree that it is "wrong" to do O_CLOEXEC-by-default (after all,
> it's trivial to disable O_CLOEXEC, but it's non-trivial to enable it on
> an existing file descriptor because it's possible for another thread to
> exec() before you set the flag). Several new syscalls and fd-returning
> facilities are O_CLOEXEC-by-default now (the most obvious being pidfds
> and seccomp notifier fds).
Sure, O_CLOEXEC *should* be the default, but this is an existing syscall so it
has to keep the existing behavior.
> At the very least there should be a new flag added that sets O_CLOEXEC.
There already is one (but these patches broke it).
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-05 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-04 20:31 Lokesh Gidra
2020-08-04 20:45 ` Eric Biggers
2020-08-04 20:49 ` Lokesh Gidra
2020-08-04 20:58 ` Eric Biggers
2020-08-04 23:34 ` Lokesh Gidra
2020-08-05 3:47 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-08-05 4:08 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-08-05 4:54 ` Lokesh Gidra
2020-08-06 23:59 ` Aleksa Sarai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200805040806.GB1136@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=calin@google.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=jeffv@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lokeshgidra@google.com \
--cc=nnk@google.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=syzbot+75867c44841cb6373570@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yanfei.xu@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®