Re: [PATCH v2] media: rcar-vin: Add support to select data pins for YCbCr422-8bit input

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

Hi Geert,

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 10:43:25AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 10:01 AM Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:32 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:12 PM Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:17 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:05 PM Niklas wrote:
> >>>>> On 2020-08-04 09:04:25 +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:28 PM Niklas wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2020-08-03 20:17:54 +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 7:06 PM Niklas wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 2020-08-03 17:02:53 +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Select the data pins for YCbCr422-8bit input format depending on
> >>>>>>>>>> bus_width and data_shift passed as part of DT.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> >>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -624,6 +624,11 @@ static int rvin_parallel_parse_v4l2(struct device *dev,
> >>>>>>>>>>       vin->parallel = rvpe;
> >>>>>>>>>>       vin->parallel->mbus_type = vep->bus_type;
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +     /* select VInDATA[15:8] pins for YCbCr422-8bit format */
> >>>>>>>>>> +     if (vep->bus.parallel.bus_width == BUS_WIDTH_8 &&
> >>>>>>>>>> +         vep->bus.parallel.data_shift == DATA_SHIFT_8)
> >>>>>>>>>> +             vin->parallel->ycbcr_8b_g = true;
> >>>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I would store the bus_width and bus_shift values in the struct
> >>>>>>>>> rvin_parallel_entity and evaluate them in place rater then create a flag
> >>>>>>>>> for this specific use-case..
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ok will do that.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Also according to the documentation is the check correct? Do we not wish
> >>>>>>>>> to use the new mode when bus_width == 16 and bus_shift == 8. The check
> >>>>>>>>> you have here seems to describe a 8 lane bus where 0 lanes are used.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> bus-width is the actual data lines used, so bus_width == 16 and
> >>>>>>>> bus_shift == 8 would mean use lines 23:8, so just check for bus_width
> >>>>>>>> == 8 and bus_shift == 8 should be sufficient.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As you and Geert points out I was wrong, they should indeed both be 8.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think you should also verify that bus_shift is either 0 or 8 as that
> >>>>>>>>> is all the driver supports.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Not sure if thats correct.In that case this patch wont make sense, I
> >>>>>>>> believed we agreed upon we determine the YDS depending on both
> >>>>>>>> bus-width and bus-shift.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm sorry I think I lost you :-) The driver is not capable of supporting
> >>>>>>> bus_width = 8 and bus_shift = 2 right? Maybe we are talking about
> >>>>>>> different things.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What I tried to say (updated with the knowledge of that bus_width should
> >>>>>>> indeed be 8 and not 16) was that would it make sens to with bus_width=8
> >>>>>>> allow for a bus_shift value other then 0 or 8? What for example would
> >>>>>>> the driver do if the value was 2?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think this should be possible but I am not sure how this will work.
> >>>>>> For example on iWave G21D-Q7 platform with 16-bit wired bus say we
> >>>>>> connect a 8-bit camera as below:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> bus-width = 8 and bus-shift = 2
> >>>>>> VI1_G0_B        -> Not connected
> >>>>>> VI1_G1_B        -> Not connected
> >>>>>> VI1_G2_B_16        -> Connected
> >>>>>> VI1_G3_B        -> Connected
> >>>>>> VI1_G4_B        -> Connected
> >>>>>> VI1_G5_B        -> Connected
> >>>>>> VI1_G6_B        -> Connected
> >>>>>> VI1_G7_B        -> Connected
> >>>>>> VI1_DATA7_B/VI1_B7_B_16    -> Connected
> >>>>>> VI1_DATA6_B/VI1_B6_B_16    -> Connected
> >>>>>> VI1_DATA5_B/VI1_B5_B_16    -> Not connected
> >>>>>> VI1_DATA4_B/VI1_B4_B_16    -> Not connected
> >>>>>> VI1_DATA3_B/VI1_B3_B_16    -> Not connected
> >>>>>> VI1_DATA2_B/VI1_B2_B_16    -> Not connected
> >>>>>> VI1_DATA1_B/VI1_B1_B_16    -> Not connected
> >>>>>> VI1_DATA0_B/VI1_B0_B_16    -> Not connected
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I agree this is how I would imagine bus-width = 8 and bus-shift = 2 to
> >>>>> be wired.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> So in this case for 8-bit YCbCr422 format should YDS be set I am not
> >>>>>> sure. Or is this not a valid case at all ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That is my question :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I can't find anything int the documentation that would allow is to do
> >>>>> anything other then bus-width = 8 together with bus-shift = 0 (do not
> >>>>> set YDS) or bus-shift = 8 (set YDS). So that is why I suggested you
> >>>>> check for this and print a warning if bus-shift is anything else :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But if you can figured out how we can do a bus-shift = 2 as in your
> >>>>> example then of course the check is wrong. I have not read the docs
> >>>>> carefully enough about this to rule it out as impossible.
> >>>>
> >>>> IIUIC, this is a completely different scenario than "low" or "high" wiring
> >>>> of 8-bit YCbCr-422, hence YDS does not apply?
> >>>>
> >>> I tend to agree. We only enable YDS if bus-width = 8 and bus-shift=8
> >>> as done by this patch. (Although there isn't enough documentation to
> >>> prove it)
> >>>
> >>>> The iWave G21D-Q7 wiring seems to be 10-bit YCbCr-422 with the 2 LSB
> >>>> bits unconnected?
> >>>>
> >>> B-8bit/ BG-16 bit for VI0 and  B-8bit/ BG-16 bit for VI0
> >>>
> >>>> Interestingly, that mode is supported on all RZ/G1 SoCs, on most R-Car
> >>>> Gen3 SoCs, but only on a single R-Car Gen2 SoC (V2H).
> >>>>
> >>> YDS mode ?
> >>
> >> No, 10-bit YCbCr-422. But please forget my comment, I was looking at
> >> the wrong table.
> >>
> >> VI1_G[7:2] plus VI1_DATA[7:6] is not even a contiguous subset (I had
> >> misread the used subset to be G[1:0] and B[7:2]), so it cannot be represented
> >> using just bus-width and bus-shift properties?
> >>
> > Yes and here is my explanation.
> >
> > In Gen1 manual for YDS bit it says the below:
> > 0: Vin_B[7:0] pins
> > 1: Vin_G[7:0] pins
> >
> > And in Gen2 manual it says,
> > 0: Vin_DATA[7:0] pins
> > 1: Vin_DATA[7:0] pins
> 
> Vin_DATA[15:8]
> 
> The difference is due to some SoCs naming the signals R[7:0], G[7:0], B[7:0],
> while other SoCs use DATA[23:0], the latter presumably to avoid
> confusion when using non-RGB input formats.
> R-Car V2H uses a mix: D[23:16]_R[7:0], D[15:8]_G[7:0], D[7:0]_B[7:0] ;-)
> 
> However, the underlying behavior is the same, which is clear from the
> RGB-666 mode, which is not using contiguous DATA[17:0], but sparse
> DATA[23:18], DATA[15:10], DATA[7:2], i.e. the 6 MSB of each color
> component.
> 
> > On iwave platform for the VIN2 interface the following G pins are connected:
> >
> >  VI2_G0_MARK, VI2_G1_MARK,
> >  VI2_G2_MARK, VI2_G3_MARK,
> >  VI2_G4_MARK, VI2_G5_MARK,
> >  VI2_G6_MARK, VI2_G7_MARK,
> >
> > And for capture to work on this interface the YDS bit has to be set.
> >
> > Now suppose some day we have a platform with 16 bit interface where G
> > and R pins are connected:
> >
> >         VI2_G0_MARK, VI2_G1_MARK,
> >         VI2_G2_MARK, VI2_G3_MARK,
> >         VI2_G4_MARK, VI2_G5_MARK,
> >         VI2_G6_MARK, VI2_G7_MARK,
> >         /* R */
> >         VI2_R0_MARK, VI2_R1_MARK,
> >         VI2_R2_MARK, VI2_R3_MARK,
> >         VI2_R4_MARK, VI2_R5_MARK,
> >         VI2_R6_MARK, VI2_R7_MARK,
> >
> > Scenarios
> > 1: Say we connect a 8-bit camera just  with the G pins - YDS has to be
> > 1 for 8-bit YCbCr
> > 2: Say we connect a 8-bit camera just with the R pins - YDS has to be
> > 0 for 8-bit YCbCr
> > 3: Now say we use G2-G7 along with R0 and R1 pins to connect a 8 bit
> > camera - YDS has to be 1 for 8-bit camera
> >
> > And looking at the Gen1 description of YDS bit, having a combination
> > of B and G is not a valid case.
> 
> Scenario 3 is indeed not supported. But G[1:0] and B[7:2] (= DATA[9:2])
> could work when using 10-bit YCbCr.
> 
> > So my vote is to have a property in the endpoint to say if YDS has to
> > be enabled as done in my first version of the patch.
> 
> "YDS" is not a generic property, "data-shift" is.

Agreed, we want something standard.

> Now, how do you specify in DT that RGB-666 mode is to be used?
> "bus-width = <18>"?
> That won't work with the (so far theoretical) case where both contiguous
> and sparse variants are supported by the hardware.  And "data-shift"
> won't help here.
> 
> Am I overdesigning? ;-)

If bus-width = <18>, VIN would know know that the 6 MSBs of each 8-bit
subset are used, as it doesn't support any other option. There's no need
for data-shift or any other property, as there's nothing to configure
:-) We could even set bus-width = <24>, it wouldn't make a difference.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart