mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: kcc@google.com, dvyukov@google.com, elver@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Finally starting on short RCU grace periods, but...
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:08:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200805230852.GA28727@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)

Hello!

If I remember correctly, one of you asked for a way to shorten RCU
grace periods so that KASAN would have a better chance of detecting bugs
such as pointers being leaked out of RCU read-side critical sections.
I am finally starting entering and testing code for this, but realized
that I had forgotten a couple of things:

1.	I don't remember exactly who asked, but I suspect that it was
	Kostya.  I am using his Reported-by as a placeholder for the
	moment, but please let me know if this should be adjusted.

2.	Although this work is necessary to detect situtions where
	call_rcu() is used to initiate a grace period, there already
	exists a way to make short grace periods that are initiated by
	synchronize_rcu(), namely, the rcupdate.rcu_expedited kernel
	boot parameter.  This will cause all calls to synchronize_rcu()
	to act like synchronize_rcu_expedited(), resulting in about 2-3
	orders of magnitude reduction in grace-period latency on small
	systems (say 16 CPUs).

In addition, I plan to make a few other adjustments that will
increase the probability of KASAN spotting a pointer leak even in the
rcupdate.rcu_expedited case.

But if you would like to start this sort of testing on current mainline,
rcupdate.rcu_expedited is your friend!

							Thanx, Paul

             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-05 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-05 23:08 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2020-08-06 10:31 ` Marco Elver
2020-08-06 13:22   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-08-06 13:25     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-08-06 13:35       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-08-06 20:58         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200805230852.GA28727@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=kcc@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®