From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Xingxing Su <suxingxing@loongson.cn>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] seqlock: Fix build errors
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 10:35:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200814083552.GE3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597378358-2546-1-git-send-email-suxingxing@loongson.cn>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:12:38PM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote:
> Fix the following build errors:
>
> In file included from ./include/linux/time.h:6:0,
> from ./include/linux/compat.h:10,
> from arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
> ./include/linux/seqlock.h: In function ‘write_seqcount_begin_nested’:
> ./include/linux/seqlock.h:286:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘raw_smp_processor_id’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
> ^
> ./arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h: At top level:
> ./arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h:28:19: error: static declaration of
> ‘raw_smp_processor_id’ follows non-static declaration
> static inline int raw_smp_processor_id(void)
> ^
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> scripts/Makefile.build:117: recipe for target 'arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.s' failed
> make[1]: *** [arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
> arch/mips/Makefile:396: recipe for target 'archprepare' failed
> make: *** [archprepare] Error 2
>
What kernel are you building?
Commit 0cd39f4600ed ("locking/seqlock, headers: Untangle the spaghetti monster")
should have solved that I think.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xingxing Su <suxingxing@loongson.cn>
> ---
> v2: update the commit message
>
> include/linux/seqlock.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> index 54bc204..4763c13 100644
> --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <linux/kcsan-checks.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
Wrong place, it's lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled() that requires
asm/percpu.h, and thus lockdep.h should include linux/smp. before
asm/percpu.h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-14 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-14 4:12 Xingxing Su
2020-08-14 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-08-14 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-08-14 10:30 ` Xingxing Su
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200814083552.GE3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=suxingxing@loongson.cn \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome