From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C16C433DF for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9B32063A for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730355AbgHQWMW (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:12:22 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:47250 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730271AbgHQWLv (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:11:51 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1k7nM6-004wAs-AJ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:11:50 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.int.ebiederm.org) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1k7nKe-0004PB-Bh; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:10:21 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, criu@openvz.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Oleg Nesterov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= , Jeff Layton , Miklos Szeredi , Matthew Wilcox , "J. Bruce Fields" , Matthew Wilcox , Trond Myklebust , Chris Wright , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , John Fastabend , KP Singh , "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:04:20 -0500 Message-Id: <20200817220425.9389-12-ebiederm@xmission.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.0 In-Reply-To: <87ft8l6ic3.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> References: <87ft8l6ic3.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-XM-SPF: eid=1k7nKe-0004PB-Bh;;;mid=<20200817220425.9389-12-ebiederm@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+qmfRJ3lIgWJPZ2rZtUxGKy6lZEDFtyz4= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: [PATCH 12/17] proc/fd: In fdinfo seq_show don't use get_files_struct X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When discussing[1] exec and posix file locks it was realized that none of the callers of get_files_struct fundamentally needed to call get_files_struct, and that by switching them to helper functions instead it will both simplify their code and remove unnecessary increments of files_struct.count. Those unnecessary increments can result in exec unnecessarily unsharing files_struct which breaking posix locks, and it can result in fget_light having to fallback to fget reducing system performance. Instead hold task_lock for the duration that task->files needs to be stable in seq_show. The task_lock was already taken in get_files_struct, and so skipping get_files_struct performs less work overall, and avoids the problems with the files_struct reference count. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180915160423.GA31461@redhat.com Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/proc/fd.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/fd.c b/fs/proc/fd.c index d9fee5390fd7..0b46eea154b7 100644 --- a/fs/proc/fd.c +++ b/fs/proc/fd.c @@ -28,9 +28,8 @@ static int seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) if (!task) return -ENOENT; - files = get_files_struct(task); - put_task_struct(task); - + task_lock(task); + files = task->files; if (files) { unsigned int fd = proc_fd(m->private); @@ -47,8 +46,9 @@ static int seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) ret = 0; } spin_unlock(&files->file_lock); - put_files_struct(files); } + task_unlock(task); + put_task_struct(task); if (ret) return ret; @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ static int seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) (long long)file->f_pos, f_flags, real_mount(file->f_path.mnt)->mnt_id); + /* show_fd_locks() never deferences files so a stale value is safe */ show_fd_locks(m, file, files); if (seq_has_overflowed(m)) goto out; -- 2.25.0