From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023F6C433DF for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 02:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6DC20738 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 02:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727792AbgHSCrr (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 22:47:47 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:15030 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727047AbgHSCrp (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 22:47:45 -0400 IronPort-SDR: L6pEgruXE4aIiFCpbNo2xc1LQGzJPGqaQEjFiMwADumXCSP/Q5mwpN0k/Fy74MuNnGRvNbGiuT qBn0XIf6/Stw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9717"; a="216562473" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,329,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="216562473" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Aug 2020 19:47:44 -0700 IronPort-SDR: HTPu3kc4NDfnQNpcql8xFm6h7Bcvs/ijovcCEMgk88lATFsD/VWz2NgT1MF8RUnPoQA28XFtl2 q0wEHbI0ZNow== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,329,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="320315331" Received: from chenyu-office.sh.intel.com ([10.239.158.173]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2020 19:47:43 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:48:58 +0800 From: Chen Yu To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List , "Zhang, Rui" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] ACPI: processor: Print more information when acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() failed Message-ID: <20200819024858.GA25038@chenyu-office.sh.intel.com> References: <20200816151230.14524-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 5:12 PM Chen Yu wrote: > > > > Some platforms have bogus _CST which might cause expectd behavior > > in the cpu idle driver. Some bogus _CST might be unable to be > > disassembled by acpica-tools due to broken format. > > Print extra log if the _CST extraction/verification failed. > > This can be used to help the user narrow down why the cpu > > idle driver fails to behave as expected. > > > > Suggested-by: Zhang Rui > > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu > > This is fine by me as a general idea, but please change the log level to "info". > Okay, I will send a new version. Thanks! thanks, Chenyu