From: peterz@infradead.org
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/cputime: Mark function as __maybe_unused
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:32:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200819073253.GV2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdn=32A4QumC_-Y8fJ29fqUPzPK0H_7-dn6rcsAT+O1xOw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:02:26PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:57 PM Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:13:10AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:04 AM Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Depending on config options, account_other_time() may not be called
> > > > anywhere. Add __maybe_unused flag to fix clang warning.
> > >
> > > Just curious, would moving this definition to be within an existing
> > > preprocessor guard for a particular config also fix the issue? If so,
> > > prefer that. If not, __maybe_unused is the way to go.
> >
> > I don't think that'd work here: it's used within an "#ifdef
> > CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING" block and a separate "#ifdef
> > CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN" one. We could do:
> > #if defined(CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) ||
> > defined(CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING)
> > ...
> > ... but that might be a bit ugly.
>
> Yeah, ok, in that case it's fine. One issue with __maybe_unused is
> that this function will stick around forever if all call sites get
> removed. But when the preprocessor checks start getting hairy,
> __maybe_unused is maybe simpler.
Urgh, also, I have vague memories that we made it 'static inline' to
avoid all this. Should we instead mark it __always_inline ?
Also; I detest the placement of __maybe_unused, it is not a return
value, but a git-grep showed me it is wide-spread :/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-19 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-18 17:03 Alex Dewar
2020-08-18 18:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-08-18 19:57 ` Alex Dewar
2020-08-18 20:02 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-08-18 20:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-08-19 7:32 ` peterz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200819073253.GV2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alex.dewar90@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®