From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] libnvdimm: eliminate a meaningless spinlock operation
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 22:30:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200820143027.3241-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200820143027.3241-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
badrange_add() take the lock "badrange->lock", but it's released
immediately in add_badrange(), protect nothing. Because the static
function add_badrange() is only called by badrange_add(), so spread its
content into badrange_add(), and move "kfree(bre_new)" out of the lock
protection.
Fixes: b3b454f694db ("libnvdimm: fix clear poison locking with spinlock ...")
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
index 9fdba8c43e8605e..7f78b659057902d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
@@ -45,12 +45,12 @@ static int alloc_and_append_badrange_entry(struct badrange *badrange,
return 0;
}
-static int add_badrange(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
+int badrange_add(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
{
struct badrange_entry *bre, *bre_new;
- spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
bre_new = kzalloc(sizeof(*bre_new), GFP_KERNEL);
+
spin_lock(&badrange->lock);
/*
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static int add_badrange(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
/* If length has changed, update this list entry */
if (bre->length != length)
bre->length = length;
+ spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
kfree(bre_new);
return 0;
}
@@ -72,22 +73,15 @@ static int add_badrange(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
* as any overlapping ranges will get resolved when the list is consumed
* and converted to badblocks
*/
- if (!bre_new)
+ if (!bre_new) {
+ spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
return -ENOMEM;
- append_badrange_entry(badrange, bre_new, addr, length);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-int badrange_add(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
-{
- int rc;
+ }
- spin_lock(&badrange->lock);
- rc = add_badrange(badrange, addr, length);
+ append_badrange_entry(badrange, bre_new, addr, length);
spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
- return rc;
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badrange_add);
--
1.8.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-20 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-20 14:30 [PATCH 0/4] clean up some functions in nvdimm/badrange.c and namespace_devs.c Zhen Lei
2020-08-20 14:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] libnvdimm: remove redundant list_empty() check in badrange.c Zhen Lei
2020-08-20 14:30 ` Zhen Lei [this message]
2020-08-20 14:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] libnvdimm: eliminate two unnecessary zero initializations " Zhen Lei
2020-08-27 6:41 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2020-08-20 14:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] libnvdimm: avoid unnecessary judgments in nvdimm_namespace_disk_name() Zhen Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200820143027.3241-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®