From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tiwai@suse.de, broonie@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
jank@cadence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org,
rander.wang@linux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com,
hui.wang@canonical.com, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com,
mengdong.lin@intel.com, bard.liao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soundwire: fix port_ready[] dynamic allocation in mipi_disco and ASoC codecs
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:45:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200821051552.GK2639@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9f12e13-49e0-5306-a975-b1b854baef02@linux.intel.com>
On 18-08-20, 07:09, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
> On 8/18/20 1:36 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 18-08-20, 01:47, Bard Liao wrote:
> > > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > The existing code allocates memory for the total number of ports.
> > > This only works if the ports are contiguous, but will break if e.g. a
> > > Devices uses port0, 1, and 14. The port_ready[] array would contain 3
> > > elements, which would lead to an out-of-bounds access. Conversely in
> > > other cases, the wrong port index would be used leading to timeouts on
> > > prepare.
> > >
> > > This can be fixed by allocating for the worst-case of 15
> > > ports (DP0..DP14). In addition since the number is now fixed, we can
> > > use an array instead of a dynamic allocation.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/soundwire/mipi_disco.c | 18 +-----------------
> > > drivers/soundwire/slave.c | 4 ++++
> > > include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 2 +-
> > > sound/soc/codecs/max98373-sdw.c | 15 +--------------
> > > sound/soc/codecs/rt1308-sdw.c | 14 +-------------
> > > sound/soc/codecs/rt5682-sdw.c | 15 +--------------
> > > sound/soc/codecs/rt700-sdw.c | 15 +--------------
> > > sound/soc/codecs/rt711-sdw.c | 15 +--------------
> > > sound/soc/codecs/rt715-sdw.c | 33 +--------------------------------
> >
> > This looks fine, but the asoc changes are not dependent, so maybe we
> > should split them up and then can go thru Mark. Or Mark acks, either way
> > would work for me
>
> There are 3 dependencies that we tracked between SoundWire and ASoC
> subsystems:
>
> a) addition of SDCA control macro (needed before SDCA codec drivers can be
> shared)
> b) this series - we could indeed submit the codec changes to Mark's tree
> separately, but then the SoundWire tree would be broken: the codec drivers
> would still try to allocate dynamically what is now a fixed-size array.
> c) configuration of the interrupt masks in codec drivers instead of
> hard-coded in bus driver + spurious parity error workaround (not posted yet
> but ready).
>
> The changes in ASoC codecs are really only on the initialization part
> (either removing a dynamic allocation or setting masks), there's no
> functional change otherwise.
>
> I think the simplest to avoid multiple back-and-forth is to have these small
> interface/initialization changes merged through the SoundWire subsystem,
> then merged by Mark from a single immutable tag. Would this work for
> everyone?
That would work for me, but you need to split the asoc, regmap, sdw
patches. I am sure looking at patch tag, other maintainers would have
skipped these patches..
> In addition, there's a WIP change to regmap to add support for SoundWire 1.2
> MBQ-based register access, but this only affects regmap and ASoC trees, all
> handled by Mark.
>
> I don't think we have any other cross-tree changes planned for now, the SDCA
> infrastructure plumbing is still rather open.
--
~Vinod
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-21 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 17:47 [PATCH 0/2] soundwire: fix port_ready[] dynamic allocation in Bard Liao
2020-08-17 17:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] soundwire: add definition for maximum number of ports Bard Liao
2020-08-18 6:35 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-18 6:53 ` Liao, Bard
2020-08-18 8:31 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-17 17:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] soundwire: fix port_ready[] dynamic allocation in mipi_disco and ASoC codecs Bard Liao
2020-08-18 6:36 ` Vinod Koul
2020-08-18 12:09 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-18 13:50 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-08-21 5:15 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200821051552.GK2639@vkoul-mobl \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bard.liao@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=jank@cadence.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mengdong.lin@intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rander.wang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®