Re: [PATCH] sparse: use static inline for __chk_{user,io}_ptr()

[Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:04:28PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Luc,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:53 AM Luc Van Oostenryck
> <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Miguel,
> >
> > Could you also take this patch in your queue?
> > It has already be sent twice but ignored by the other channels.
> 
> Yeah, no problem. However, what about all those emails from the test
> bot? Is the bot using an old version of sparse or something like that?

Thanks.
The bot uses the very latest sparse version (which is very nice)
but is giving here false warnings. The change in the patch has as
consequence to change related warnings:
	: ...
	:   expected void const volatile [noderef] __user *
	:   got ...
into:
	: ...
	:   expected void const volatile [noderef] __user *ptr
	:   got ...

But to the bot, any change to the content of the warning itself
or its associated info is presented as a new warning.
I've talked to the bot's guys about this problem and they've
replied that they're seriously considering to change this behaviour.

Best regards,
-- Luc