From: peterz@infradead.org
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Requirements to control kernel isolation/nohz_full at runtime
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:34:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200907153417.GL1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200901104640.GA13814@lenoir>
(your mailer broke and forgot to keep lines shorter than 78 chars)
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:46:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> == TIF_NOHZ ==
>
> Need to get rid of that in order not to trigger syscall slowpath on
> CPUs that don't want nohz_full. Also we don't want to iterate all
> threads and clear the flag when the last nohz_full CPU exits nohz_full
> mode. Prefer static keys to call context tracking on archs. x86 does
> that well.
Build on the common entry code I suppose. Then any arch that uses that
gets to have the new features.
> == Proper entry code ==
>
> We must make sure that a given arch never calls exception_enter() /
> exception_exit(). This saves the previous state of context tracking
> and switch to kernel mode (from context tracking POV) temporarily.
> Since this state is saved on the stack, this prevents us from turning
> off context tracking entirely on a CPU: The tracking must be done on
> all CPUs and that takes some cycles.
>
> This means that, considering early entry code (before the call to
> context tracking upon kernel entry, and after the call to context
> tracking upon kernel exit), we must take care of few things:
>
> 1) Make sure early entry code can't trigger exceptions. Or if it does,
> the given exception can't schedule or use RCU (unless it calls
> rcu_nmi_enter()). Otherwise the exception must call
> exception_enter()/exception_exit() which we don't want.
I think this is true for x86. Early entry has interrupts disabled, any
exception that can still happen is NMI-like and will thus use
rcu_nmi_enter().
On x86 that now includes #DB (which is also excluded due to us refusing
to set execution breakpoints on entry code), #BP, NMI and MCE.
> 2) No call to schedule_user().
I'm not sure what that is supposed to do, but x86 doesn't appear to have
it, so all good :-)
> 3) Make sure early entry code is not interruptible or
> preempt_schedule_irq() would rely on
> exception_entry()/exception_exit()
This is so for x86.
> 4) Make sure early entry code can't be traced (no call to
> preempt_schedule_notrace()), or if it does it can't schedule
noinstr is your friend.
> I believe x86 does most of that well.
It does now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-07 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-01 10:46 Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-03 18:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-09-03 18:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-09-03 18:36 ` Phil Auld
2020-09-03 18:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-09-09 22:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-09 22:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-04 20:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-09 22:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-07 15:34 ` peterz [this message]
2020-09-09 23:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200907153417.GL1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome