From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94353C43461 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C280206E7 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731510AbgIGRpB (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:45:01 -0400 Received: from brightrain.aerifal.cx ([216.12.86.13]:50098 "EHLO brightrain.aerifal.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731493AbgIGRom (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:44:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 13:44:37 -0400 From: Rich Felker To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Michael Karcher , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yoshinori Sato Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: fix syscall tracing Message-ID: <20200907174436.GK3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20200903054803.GX3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200903161639.GE3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1a3f0f7e-f6e6-db4e-06ad-9c7d560a6265@physik.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1a3f0f7e-f6e6-db4e-06ad-9c7d560a6265@physik.fu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:52:20AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Rich! > > On 9/3/20 6:16 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >> I can confirm that this patch fixes both strace for me and does not break libseccomp, > >> I have run the libseccomp testsuite with my patch for SuperH support applied on top > >> of a rebased libseccomp with the 32-bit fixes. Attaching the testsuite log. > >> > >> Tested-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > > > > Great! Thanks! > > Can we still get this merged as a hotfix for 5.9? Yes, fixes for regressions in the same release cycle are in-scope (the whole point of having -rc's). I have at least one other fix that needs to go in too and was just giving it a little time to make sure everything's ok now and that there are no more. Rich