mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"Russell King - ARM Linux admin" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
	"Dan Murphy" <dmurphy@ti.com>,
	"Ondřej Jirman" <megous@megous.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Matthias Schiffer" <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Yet another ethernet PHY LED control proposal
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 22:30:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914203006.GA20984@duo.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200912011045.35bad071@nic.cz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1740 bytes --]

Hi!

> I have been thinking about another way to implement ABI for HW control
> of ethernet PHY connected LEDs.
> 
> This proposal is inspired by the fact that for some time there is a
> movement in the kernel to do transparent HW offloading of things (DSA
> is an example of that).

And it is good proposal.

> So currently we have the `netdev` trigger. When this is enabled for a
> LED, new files will appear in that LED's sysfs directory:
>   - `device_name` where user is supposed to write interface name
>   - `link` if set to 1, the LED will be ON if the interface is linked
>   - `rx` if set to 1, the LED will blink on receive event
>   - `tx` if set to 1, the LED will blink on transmit event
>   - `interval` specifies duration of the LED blink
> 
> Now what is interesting is that almost all combinations of link/rx/tx
> settings are offloadable to a Marvell PHY! (Not to all LEDs, though...)
> 
> So what if we abandoned the idea of a `hw` trigger, and instead just
> allowed a LED trigger to be offloadable, if that specific LED supports
> it?
> 
> For the HW mode for different speed we can just expand the `link` sysfs
> file ABI, so that if user writes a specific speed to this file, instead
> of just "1", the LED will be on if the interface is linked on that
> specific speed. Or maybe another sysfs file could be used for "light on
> N mbps" setting...
> 
> Afterwards we can figure out other possible modes.
> 
> What do you think?

If this can be implemented (and it probably can) it is the best
solution :-).

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-11 23:10 Marek Behun
2020-09-14 20:30 ` Pavel Machek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200914203006.GA20984@duo.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=marek.behun@nic.cz \
    --cc=matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=megous@megous.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®