From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7547C43461 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79F02076B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727189AbgIPA2z (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:28:55 -0400 Received: from brightrain.aerifal.cx ([216.12.86.13]:54006 "EHLO brightrain.aerifal.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727109AbgIPA2s (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:28:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 20:28:45 -0400 From: Rich Felker To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: Rob Landley , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Michael Karcher , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yoshinori Sato Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: fix syscall tracing Message-ID: <20200916002843.GR3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20200903054803.GX3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20200903161639.GE3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1a3f0f7e-f6e6-db4e-06ad-9c7d560a6265@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20200907174436.GK3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <3b8d5e6a-38d6-6eca-a49a-69e06680ec1c@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20200910133751.GE3265@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:35:28PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi Rich! > > On 9/10/20 3:37 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > >> Which I reported to Rich on the 2nd and he had me test a one line patch fixing > >> it (adding an extra #include) on the 3rd, but I just did a fresh pull and the > >> j2_defconfig build still broke a week later. > > > > Yes, that's presently the other regression fix I have queued for the > > second pull request. > > Any news on this? Seems like Linus just tagged -rc5 this week. I rebased against -rc5 and pushed for-next a couple days ago. It doesn't look like there are any problems so I'll proceed with the PR. Rich