From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22EEC4727E for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA0723600 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:30:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600774249; bh=kkHMiTnA8Nd+aNMKB4+cFh6WyDZVD2UyQqEdCRsNUHI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=LUPQ6iOpGLKarBGJD/XhGNQZ3Vnx2C+Ht6meKI8littynxPQOBiKgpe+bd3mWmqgv 9T8KCg9e4h6GBO/s9ylnb3aDJ5AlJgyjLcPYjEoud7d+7iPSO4pbWl2bu+tKrmGPg7 N/PER828JX2AjOAkBRc9bZbOh1Fke2NRuK1lRhfE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726571AbgIVLas (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:30:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44092 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726454AbgIVLas (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:30:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35B60221EB; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:30:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600774247; bh=kkHMiTnA8Nd+aNMKB4+cFh6WyDZVD2UyQqEdCRsNUHI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Dbq8X/tmUq2LMM968Bp1Ys6XHzFCqQ8pvadivZlll9wmipSA3kAcm/4GO4Bsr71Kq EpL+rhPpGlnjHlpy4a1IJiTlIBCS5Mbwn2XWPmvhV6Cb3W3I6qmOen+N79zxQUcaS+ YzzrL5PWJB1Itu+C3gjJU75AxcJGeyXmXIgeVPTg= Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:29:54 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Michal Simek Cc: Amit Kumar Mahapatra , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sgoud@xilinx.com, nagasure@xilinx.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Fix kernel-doc warnings Message-ID: <20200922112954.GQ4792@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200909152708.2767-1-amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> <20200909152708.2767-2-amit.kumar-mahapatra@xilinx.com> <20200917172819.GA50407@sirena.org.uk> <83866279-52f2-6c85-40b4-e0b78ad2d713@xilinx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0fZkDq/H4AmqaB8D" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83866279-52f2-6c85-40b4-e0b78ad2d713@xilinx.com> X-Cookie: Love thy neighbor, tune thy piano. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --0fZkDq/H4AmqaB8D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 01:24:18PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > for-next/for-linus/for-5.10 and I can't see any issue with applying > these patches. > Can you please let us know if what tree/branch should be used? In the first instance I'll try to apply against for-5.10. --0fZkDq/H4AmqaB8D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl9p4DEACgkQJNaLcl1U h9A50wf+N6ohMbgVl81zvY1qCcAAWyJl1teB1/HySXDUtt5pZaNWpYqztgcRnywQ sKE/A1/XQqwEHoEhDaqaI29/y3yGpu9RX4CH1AYr5oh6KGVWiYjRZXij7uraAzFK lZ4ZhUIpJXL/FLDtfZ5JyajRA4QmqgE4dYqowJUr+6tVLAJENaODC2zk/Up1U+Uj te7foQrDbC1nt4sJ/oSVXRpksdAI798WcatoH4DeeunRRYez3nVqgmkbsk8PCM0V 4YC/R9sQIvYlP8KpgLL3gZew1/jEtPZaJFr5j+0dUSZRbR30HyAZPRaQA3135bZm 7LZMPNPclFt4EfflmRkHnKsspoPHIw== =1N3X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0fZkDq/H4AmqaB8D--