mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [stable 4.19] [PANIC]: tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:54:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200925105458.567d0bf4@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYuokHUBwNkTs=gWqCHxj80gg+RetU4pRd+uLP7gNas4KQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:55:13 +0530
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 10:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:13:05AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:  
> > > >From stable rc 4.18.1 onwards to today's stable rc 4.19.147  
> > >
> > > There are two problems  while running LTP tracing tests
> > > 1) kernel panic  on i386, qemu_i386, x86_64 and qemu_x86_64 [1]
> > > 2) " segfault at 0 ip " and "Code: Bad RIP value" on x86_64 and qemu_x86_64 [2]
> > > Please refer to the full test logs from below links.
> > >
> > > The first bad commit found by git bisect.
> > >    commit: c3bc8fd637a9623f5c507bd18f9677effbddf584
> > >    tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>  
> >
> > So this also is reproducable in 5.4 and Linus's tree right now?  
> 
> No.
> The reported issues are not reproducible on 5.4, 5.8 and Linus's tree.

The crash looks like its cr3 related, which I believe Peter Zijlstra
did a restructuring of that code to not let it be an issue anymore.
I'll have to look deeper. The rework may be too intrusive to backport,
but we do have other work arounds for this issue if that would be
acceptable for backporting.

> 
> >
> > Or are newer kernels working fine?  
> 
> No.
> There are different issues while testing LTP tracing on 5.4, 5.8 and
> Linus 's 5.9.
> 
> NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (igb): transmit queue 2 timed out
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 331 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:442 dev_watchdog+0x4c7/0x4d0
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYtS_nAX=sPV8zTTs-nOdpJ4uxk9sqeHOZNuS4WLvBcPGg@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> I see this on 5.4, 5.8 and Linus 's 5.9.
> rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
> ? ftrace_graph_caller+0xc0/0xc0
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYsdTLRj55_bvod8Sf+0zvK0RRMp5+FeJcOx5oAcAKOGXA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u

I've seen that too and couldn't bisect it down to any such commit. I'm
not sure if it is even a bug per-se, because in my test suite, I've
commented out the warning, and the system still remains stable.

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-25 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-23  2:38 [lkp-robot] [tracing] c3bc8fd637: WARNING:at_kernel/rcu/tree.c:#rcu_irq_enter kernel test robot
2018-08-28 19:53 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-25  4:43   ` [stable 4.19] [PANIC]: tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage Naresh Kamboju
2020-09-25  5:15     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-09-25  7:25       ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-09-25 14:54         ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-09-25 14:59           ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-25 15:07             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-25 15:12               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-09-25 15:30                 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-10-05 13:18                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200925105458.567d0bf4@oasis.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®