From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, bp@suse.de,
luto@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: len.brown@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, jing2.liu@intel.com,
ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 12/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update xstate context copy function for supporting dynamic area
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 13:39:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201001203913.9125-13-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201001203913.9125-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
There are xstate context copy functions that used in ptrace() and signal
return paths. They serve callers to read (or write) xstate values in the
task->fpu's buffer, or to get initial values. With dynamic user states, a
component's position in the buffer may vary and the initial value is not
always stored in init_fpstate.
Change the helpers to find a component's offset accordingly (either lookup
table or calculation).
When copying an initial value, explicitly check the init_fpstate coverage.
If not found, reset the memory in the destination. Otherwise, copy values
from init_fpstate.
No functional change until the kernel supports dynamic user states.
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
index 556ae8593806..b9261ab4e5e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
@@ -245,12 +245,14 @@ void fpstate_sanitize_xstate(struct fpu *fpu)
if (!(xfeatures & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE))
memset(&fx->xmm_space[0], 0, 256);
+ /* Make sure 'xfeatures' to be a subset of fpu->state_mask */
+ xfeatures = ((xfeatures_mask_user() & fpu->state_mask) & ~xfeatures);
/*
* First two features are FPU and SSE, which above we handled
* in a special way already:
*/
feature_bit = 0x2;
- xfeatures = (xfeatures_mask_user() & ~xfeatures) >> 2;
+ xfeatures >>= 0x2;
/*
* Update all the remaining memory layouts according to their
@@ -259,12 +261,15 @@ void fpstate_sanitize_xstate(struct fpu *fpu)
*/
while (xfeatures) {
if (xfeatures & 0x1) {
- int offset = xstate_comp_offsets[feature_bit];
- int size = xstate_sizes[feature_bit];
-
- memcpy((void *)xsave + offset,
- (void *)&init_fpstate.xsave + offset,
- size);
+ unsigned int offset = get_xstate_comp_offset(fpu, feature_bit);
+ unsigned int size = xstate_sizes[feature_bit];
+
+ if (get_init_fpstate_mask() & BIT_ULL(feature_bit))
+ memcpy((void *)xsave + offset,
+ (void *)&init_fpstate.xsave + offset,
+ size);
+ else
+ memset((void *)xsave + offset, 0, size);
}
xfeatures >>= 1;
@@ -1238,7 +1243,10 @@ static void fill_gap(struct membuf *to, unsigned *last, unsigned offset)
{
if (*last >= offset)
return;
- membuf_write(to, (void *)&init_fpstate.xsave + *last, offset - *last);
+ if (offset <= get_init_fpstate_size())
+ membuf_write(to, (void *)&init_fpstate.xsave + *last, offset - *last);
+ else
+ membuf_zero(to, offset - *last);
*last = offset;
}
@@ -1246,7 +1254,10 @@ static void copy_part(struct membuf *to, unsigned *last, unsigned offset,
unsigned size, void *from)
{
fill_gap(to, last, offset);
- membuf_write(to, from, size);
+ if (from)
+ membuf_write(to, from, size);
+ else
+ membuf_zero(to, size);
*last = offset + size;
}
@@ -1298,12 +1309,22 @@ void copy_xstate_to_kernel(struct membuf to, struct fpu *fpu)
sizeof(header), &header);
for (i = FIRST_EXTENDED_XFEATURE; i < XFEATURE_MAX; i++) {
+ u64 mask = BIT_ULL(i);
+ void *src;
/*
- * Copy only in-use xstates:
+ * Copy only in-use xstate at first. If the feature is enabled,
+ * find the init value, whether stored in init_fpstate or simply
+ * zeros, and then copy them.
*/
- if ((header.xfeatures >> i) & 1) {
- void *src = __raw_xsave_addr(fpu, i);
-
+ if (header.xfeatures & mask) {
+ src = __raw_xsave_addr(fpu, i);
+ copy_part(&to, &last, xstate_offsets[i],
+ xstate_sizes[i], src);
+ } else if (xfeatures_mask_user() & mask) {
+ if (get_init_fpstate_mask() & mask)
+ src = (void *)&init_fpstate.xsave + last;
+ else
+ src = NULL;
copy_part(&to, &last, xstate_offsets[i],
xstate_sizes[i], src);
}
@@ -1337,6 +1358,9 @@ int copy_kernel_to_xstate(struct fpu *fpu, const void *kbuf)
if (hdr.xfeatures & mask) {
void *dst = __raw_xsave_addr(fpu, i);
+ if (!dst)
+ continue;
+
offset = xstate_offsets[i];
size = xstate_sizes[i];
@@ -1394,6 +1418,9 @@ int copy_user_to_xstate(struct fpu *fpu, const void __user *ubuf)
if (hdr.xfeatures & mask) {
void *dst = __raw_xsave_addr(fpu, i);
+ if (!dst)
+ continue;
+
offset = xstate_offsets[i];
size = xstate_sizes[i];
@@ -1476,7 +1503,7 @@ void copy_supervisor_to_kernel(struct fpu *fpu)
continue;
/* Move xfeature 'i' into its normal location */
- memmove(xbuf + xstate_comp_offsets[i],
+ memmove(xbuf + get_xstate_comp_offset(fpu, i),
xbuf + xstate_supervisor_only_offsets[i],
xstate_sizes[i]);
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-01 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-01 20:38 [RFC PATCH 00/22] x86: Support Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 01/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify area init helper prototypes to access all the possible areas Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 02/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify xstate copy " Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 03/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify address finder " Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 04/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Modify save and restore helper " Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 05/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce a new variable for dynamic user states Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 06/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Outline dynamic xstate area size in the task context Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 07/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce helpers to manage an xstate area dynamically Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 23:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-13 22:00 ` Brown, Len
2020-10-01 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH 08/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Define the scope of the initial xstate data Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 09/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce wrapper functions for organizing xstate area access Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 10/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update xstate save function for supporting dynamic user xstate Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 11/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Update xstate area address finder " Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 13/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Expand dynamic user state area on first use Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 23:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-13 22:31 ` Brown, Len
2020-10-13 22:43 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-14 1:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-14 6:03 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-14 16:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-14 16:29 ` Dave Hansen
2020-11-03 21:32 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-11-03 21:41 ` Dave Hansen
2020-11-03 21:53 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2020-10-14 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-14 1:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 14/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Inherit dynamic user state when used in the parent Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 15/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Support ptracer-induced xstate area expansion Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 16/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic user state in the signal handling path Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 17/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Extend the table for mapping xstate components with features Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 18/22] x86/cpufeatures/amx: Enumerate Advanced Matrix Extension (AMX) feature bits Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 19/22] x86/fpu/amx: Define AMX state components and have it used for boot-time checks Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 20/22] x86/fpu/amx: Enable the AMX feature in 64-bit mode Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 21/22] selftest/x86/amx: Include test cases for the AMX state management Chang S. Bae
2020-10-01 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 22/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce boot-parameters for control some state component support Chang S. Bae
2020-10-02 2:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-13 23:00 ` Brown, Len
2020-10-02 17:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-10-02 17:26 ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-13 23:38 ` Brown, Len
2020-10-02 17:25 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201001203913.9125-13-chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®