From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C8BC41604 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 21:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F542206C1 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 21:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726015AbgJCVcz (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2020 17:32:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58356 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725897AbgJCVcy (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2020 17:32:54 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net (shards.monkeyblade.net [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:9]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E4B2C0613D0; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 14:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f00:477::3d5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDD4911E3E4C0; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 14:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 14:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20201003.143252.1162624907281801666.davem@davemloft.net> To: dhowells@redhat.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/23] rxrpc: Fixes and preparation for RxGK From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <2450213.1601760295@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <160156420377.1728886.5309670328610130816.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <2438800.1601755309@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <2450213.1601760295@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [2620:137:e000::1:9]); Sat, 03 Oct 2020 14:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: David Howells Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 22:24:55 +0100 > David Miller wrote: > >> > Since the fixes in the set need to go after the patches in net-next, should I >> > resubmit just those for net-next, or sit on them till -rc1? >> >> My 'net' tree is always open for bug fixes, and that's where bug fixes >> belong. Not 'net-next'. > > "Need to go after the patches in net-next" - ie. there's a dependency. If the bugs exist before your net-next changes, that doesn't make any sense. The fixes have to be against whatever is in 'net'. If the fixes are introduced by your net-next changes, you should integrate them into your net-next changes.