From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DC7C433DF for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 03:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9A42074F for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 03:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394302AbgJPDyr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:54:47 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55152 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2393647AbgJPDyr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:54:47 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6325F2074F; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 03:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 23:54:44 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Linus Torvalds , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Tom Zanussi Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: Updates for 5.10 Message-ID: <20201015235444.6f222746@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20201016115323.13a75e51d5dc18573de4d33a@kernel.org> References: <20201015135345.6b29e8c0@gandalf.local.home> <20201015222139.1b92a3be@gandalf.local.home> <20201016115323.13a75e51d5dc18573de4d33a@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:53:23 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > > I'll have to think about how to untangle this. Is there some kind of > > annotation that makes it show that a path can only be called at boot up and > > not later? > > What happen if we use Peter's static_call() and update it after boot up? I think that's a bit over engineering ;-) > Or, we might need to break apart the trace_array_create() and restruct > it as __init trace_array_early_create() and trace_array_create(). That will likely make the code a bit more complex and possibly add as much code as we save from the __init sections. I think the best solution is what you proposed, and removing the __init, and possibly making that function inline as well. Care to send an official patch? Thanks! -- Steve