From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, like.xu@linux.intel.com,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/arch: Remove perf_sample_data::regs_user_copy
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:59:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201030105917.GI2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877dr8nh6u.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:26:01AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> What's worse is perf_sample_data which is 384 bytes and is 64 bytes aligned.
Here; this shrinks it to 192 bytes. Combined with the static dummy this
should reduce stack usage by 360 bytes.
---
Subject: perf/arch: Remove perf_sample_data::regs_user_copy
struct perf_sample_data lives on-stack, we should be careful about it's
size. Furthermore, the pt_regs copy in there is only because x86_64 is a
trainwreck, solve it differently.
Halves sizeof(perf_sample_data).
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c | 3 +--
arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 15 +++++++++++----
include/linux/perf_event.h | 6 ------
include/linux/perf_regs.h | 6 ++----
kernel/events/core.c | 8 +++-----
10 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 05fe92aa7d98..0529f90395c9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 94e8718e7229..f6f58e6265df 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -73,8 +73,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
diff --git a/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c
index eb32838b8210..09b7f88a2d6a 100644
--- a/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -32,8 +32,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
index 8e53f2fc3fe0..6f681b105eec 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -144,8 +144,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = (regs_user->regs) ? perf_reg_abi(current) :
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 04a38fbeb9c7..fd304a248de6 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 4352a504f235..6e9e5d5e927e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/*
* Use the regs from the first interruption and let
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index bb7e1132290b..750129bf539c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -101,8 +101,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
}
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
@@ -129,12 +128,20 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64;
}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, nmi_user_regs);
+
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy = this_cpu_ptr(&nmi_user_regs);
struct pt_regs *user_regs = task_pt_regs(current);
+ if (!in_nmi()) {
+ regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
+ regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
+ return;
+ }
+
/*
* If we're in an NMI that interrupted task_pt_regs setup, then
* we can't sample user regs at all. This check isn't really
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 0c19d279b97f..e58f4e6b6e1c 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1022,13 +1022,7 @@ struct perf_sample_data {
struct perf_callchain_entry *callchain;
u64 aux_size;
- /*
- * regs_user may point to task_pt_regs or to regs_user_copy, depending
- * on arch details.
- */
struct perf_regs regs_user;
- struct pt_regs regs_user_copy;
-
struct perf_regs regs_intr;
u64 stack_user_size;
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_regs.h b/include/linux/perf_regs.h
index 2d12e97d5e7b..5efcdb768c75 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_regs.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_regs.h
@@ -20,8 +20,7 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx);
int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask);
u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task);
void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy);
+ struct pt_regs *regs);
#else
#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
@@ -42,8 +41,7 @@ static inline u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
}
static inline void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs);
{
regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index da467e1dd49a..14709182d94e 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6374,14 +6374,13 @@ perf_output_sample_regs(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
}
static void perf_sample_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct pt_regs *regs_user_copy)
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
if (user_mode(regs)) {
regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
regs_user->regs = regs;
} else if (!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
- perf_get_regs_user(regs_user, regs, regs_user_copy);
+ perf_get_regs_user(regs_user, regs);
} else {
regs_user->abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE;
regs_user->regs = NULL;
@@ -7083,8 +7082,7 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_event_header *header,
}
if (sample_type & (PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER | PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER))
- perf_sample_regs_user(&data->regs_user, regs,
- &data->regs_user_copy);
+ perf_sample_regs_user(&data->regs_user, regs);
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER) {
/* regs dump ABI info */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-30 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-30 4:27 [BUG] Stack overflow when running perf and function tracer Steven Rostedt
2020-10-30 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 10:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-30 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30 11:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-30 13:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-30 10:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-10-30 12:33 ` [PATCH] perf/arch: Remove perf_sample_data::regs_user_copy Steven Rostedt
2020-10-30 11:19 ` [PATCH] perf/x86: Make dummy_iregs static Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201030105917.GI2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®