From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E643AC388F9 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 20:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19BC206F9 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 20:05:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604174750; bh=1Spt7E/h+lOQId9KrMw1DcEaITriY24WYnLpjKmK2nY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=nIpAOB7v8YWhfIWqYA1U84IyZK4dG0nS4YPwyz2urMVO2Xh4xLhtxX2rMnQUmgPja ykM9joIGz0gHshI9HdGALLxPg82eyzNzo79o5vhy8qjfCHj3bd8AHVHSr/ajr8j1TU m0dAapXtjJVNxNqP0CcJ5iBTRJ4+ElxSHxqIS+Ps= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728573AbgJaUFt (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:05:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33766 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728561AbgJaUFs (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:05:48 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47CA0206F7; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 20:05:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604174747; bh=1Spt7E/h+lOQId9KrMw1DcEaITriY24WYnLpjKmK2nY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=P14brFCOSpQW65Dbdx5U7se86/FZiSqKzg4jcdn4ytDHfpGGaWGUhXkfdWp4g1nEg ct+ZRPM3QAII1WWxbGoaBzAjOw07Cgx667qA/1efhlIPAle9uBia0Pc3BljgyDlVEb is27XL0W4OVlI0eaFhJX4/ZcXoBzySkEaO8gqfCY= Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:05:46 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Anand K Mistry Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, asteinhauser@google.com, joelaf@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, Alexey Dobriyan , Alexey Gladkov , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , NeilBrown , Peter Zijlstra , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Provide details on indirect branch speculation Message-Id: <20201031130546.d2b94345008e807f548dc068@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20201030172731.1.I7782b0cedb705384a634cfd8898eb7523562da99@changeid> References: <20201030172731.1.I7782b0cedb705384a634cfd8898eb7523562da99@changeid> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 17:27:54 +1100 Anand K Mistry wrote: > Similar to speculation store bypass, show information about the indirect > branch speculation mode of a task in /proc/$pid/status. Why is this considered useful?