mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Nishanth Aravamudan" <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>,
	"Julien Desfossez" <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>,
	"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Vineeth Pillai" <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Aaron Lu" <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>,
	"Aubrey Li" <aubrey.intel@gmail.com>,
	"Thomas Glexiner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Greg Kerr" <kerrnel@google.com>, "Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
	"Valentin Schneider" <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	"Pawan Gupta" <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	vineeth@bitbyteword.org, "Chen Yu" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	"Christian Brauner" <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	"Agata Gruza" <agata.gruza@intel.com>,
	"Antonio Gomez Iglesias" <antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com>,
	graf@amazon.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
	"Dario Faggioli" <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
	"Paul Turner" <pjt@google.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Patrick Bellasi" <derkling@google.com>,
	"benbjiang(蒋彪)" <benbjiang@tencent.com>,
	"Alexandre Chartre" <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
	James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, OWeisse@umich.edu,
	"Dhaval Giani" <dhaval.giani@oracle.com>,
	"Junaid Shahid" <junaids@google.com>,
	"Jesse Barnes" <jsbarnes@google.com>,
	"Hyser,Chris" <chris.hyser@oracle.com>,
	"Aubrey Li" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 -tip 08/26] sched/fair: Snapshot the min_vruntime of CPUs on force idle
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 17:41:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201031214111.GA2798587@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201030084112.GX2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 09:41:12AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:42:29PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> 
> > Forgot to ask, do you also need to do the task_vruntime_update() for
> > the unconstrained pick?
> 
> Humm.. interesting case.
> 
> Yes, however... since in that case the picks aren't synchronized it's a
> wee bit dodgy. I'll throw it on the pile together with SMT4.

Ok. I threw it into the patch below anyway to not take any chances. I got the
version of your patch to a point where the perf is looking good (there's
still some room for improvement, but I am much much happier with the tests).

The changes are:
- Fix but in !(fib && !fi) thingie.
- Pass prio_less with with force-idle information ... prio_less() is called
  from various paths. We need to be careful what we pass it. Its possible we
  select idle on something, but we are not done with selection yet - we
  continue doing prio_less(). So just pass it fi_before.
- During enqueue, prio_less is used then, we may need to sync even then.
- Make cfs_prio_less sync even when !fi.
- Sync the min_vruntime for unconstrained picks and during prio_less() even
  when the core is not in FI. Clarify why you feel for its dodgy for sync'ing
  when unconstrained?

> Also, I'm still hoping you can make this form work:
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201026093131.GF2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
> 
> (note that the put_prev_task() needs an additional rq argument)
> 
> That's both simpler code and faster.

Sure, I'll give that a go soon.

(This is based on our older 4.19 kernel, so the task_tick_fair() bit needed
changes to make it work - which aren't needed in v8).

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 711f8a78a947..c15fd5bbc707 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static inline int __task_prio(struct task_struct *p)
  */
 
 /* real prio, less is less */
-static inline bool prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b)
+static inline bool prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool in_fi)
 {
 
 	int pa = __task_prio(a), pb = __task_prio(b);
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static inline bool prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b)
 		return !dl_time_before(a->dl.deadline, b->dl.deadline);
 
 	if (pa == MAX_RT_PRIO + MAX_NICE) /* fair */
-		return cfs_prio_less(a, b);
+		return cfs_prio_less(a, b, in_fi);
 
 	return false;
 }
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static inline bool __sched_core_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *
 		return false;
 
 	/* flip prio, so high prio is leftmost */
-	if (prio_less(b, a))
+	if (prio_less(b, a, task_rq(a)->core->core_forceidle))
 		return true;
 
 	return false;
@@ -4025,7 +4025,7 @@ void sched_core_irq_exit(void)
  * - Else returns idle_task.
  */
 static struct task_struct *
-pick_task(struct rq *rq, const struct sched_class *class, struct task_struct *max)
+pick_task(struct rq *rq, const struct sched_class *class, struct task_struct *max, bool in_fi)
 {
 	struct task_struct *class_pick, *cookie_pick;
 	unsigned long cookie = rq->core->core_cookie;
@@ -4040,7 +4040,7 @@ pick_task(struct rq *rq, const struct sched_class *class, struct task_struct *ma
 		 * higher priority than max.
 		 */
 		if (max && class_pick->core_cookie &&
-		    prio_less(class_pick, max))
+		    prio_less(class_pick, max, in_fi))
 			return idle_sched_class.pick_task(rq);
 
 		return class_pick;
@@ -4059,13 +4059,15 @@ pick_task(struct rq *rq, const struct sched_class *class, struct task_struct *ma
 	 * the core (so far) and it must be selected, otherwise we must go with
 	 * the cookie pick in order to satisfy the constraint.
 	 */
-	if (prio_less(cookie_pick, class_pick) &&
-	    (!max || prio_less(max, class_pick)))
+	if (prio_less(cookie_pick, class_pick, in_fi) &&
+	    (!max || prio_less(max, class_pick, in_fi)))
 		return class_pick;
 
 	return cookie_pick;
 }
 
+extern void task_vruntime_update(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool in_fi);
+
 static struct task_struct *
 pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 {
@@ -4141,15 +4143,6 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 			update_rq_clock(rq_i);
 	}
 
-	if (!fi_before) {
-		for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
-			struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
-
-			/* Reset the snapshot if core is no longer in force-idle. */
-			rq_i->cfs.min_vruntime_fi = rq_i->cfs.min_vruntime;
-		}
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * Try and select tasks for each sibling in decending sched_class
 	 * order.
@@ -4174,7 +4167,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 			 * highest priority task already selected for this
 			 * core.
 			 */
-			p = pick_task(rq_i, class, max);
+			p = pick_task(rq_i, class, max, fi_before);
 			if (!p) {
 				/*
 				 * If there weren't no cookies; we don't need
@@ -4199,6 +4192,10 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 			 */
 			if (i == cpu && !need_sync && !p->core_cookie) {
 				next = p;
+
+				WARN_ON_ONCE(fi_before);
+				task_vruntime_update(rq_i, p, false);
+
 				goto done;
 			}
 
@@ -4206,6 +4203,11 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 				occ++;
 
 			rq_i->core_pick = p;
+			if (rq_i->idle == p && rq_i->nr_running) {
+				rq->core->core_forceidle = true;
+				if (!fi_before)
+					rq->core->core_forceidle_seq++;
+			}
 
 			/*
 			 * If this new candidate is of higher priority than the
@@ -4224,6 +4226,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 				max = p;
 
 				if (old_max) {
+					rq->core->core_forceidle = false;
 					for_each_cpu(j, smt_mask) {
 						if (j == i)
 							continue;
@@ -4268,29 +4271,22 @@ next_class:;
 
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!rq_i->core_pick);
 
-		if (is_idle_task(rq_i->core_pick) && rq_i->nr_running) {
-			rq_i->core_forceidle = true;
-			need_sync = true;
-		}
+		if (!(!fi_before && rq->core->core_forceidle)) {
+			task_vruntime_update(rq_i, rq_i->core_pick, true);
 
-		rq_i->core_pick->core_occupation = occ;
+			rq_i->core_pick->core_occupation = occ;
 
-		if (i == cpu)
-			continue;
+			if (i == cpu)
+				continue;
 
-		if (rq_i->curr != rq_i->core_pick)
-			resched_curr(rq_i);
+			if (rq_i->curr != rq_i->core_pick) {
+				resched_curr(rq_i);
+			}
+		}
 
 		/* Did we break L1TF mitigation requirements? */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!cookie_match(next, rq_i->core_pick));
-	}
-
-	if (!fi_before && need_sync) {
-		for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
-			struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
-
-			/* Snapshot if core is in force-idle. */
-			rq_i->cfs.min_vruntime_fi = rq_i->cfs.min_vruntime;
+		if (unlikely(!cookie_match(next, rq_i->core_pick))) {
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		}
 	}
 done:
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 7e36608477aa..6d8e16bc3d79 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -483,36 +483,30 @@ static inline u64 cfs_rq_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-bool cfs_prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b)
+static void se_fi_update(struct sched_entity *se, unsigned int fi_seq, bool forceidle);
+bool cfs_prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool in_fi)
 {
-	bool samecpu = task_cpu(a) == task_cpu(b);
+	struct rq *rq = task_rq(a);
 	struct sched_entity *sea = &a->se;
 	struct sched_entity *seb = &b->se;
 	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rqa;
 	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rqb;
 	s64 delta;
 
-	if (samecpu) {
-		/* vruntime is per cfs_rq */
-		while (!is_same_group(sea, seb)) {
-			int sea_depth = sea->depth;
-			int seb_depth = seb->depth;
+	SCHED_WARN_ON(task_rq(b)->core != rq->core);
 
-			if (sea_depth >= seb_depth)
-				sea = parent_entity(sea);
-			if (sea_depth <= seb_depth)
-				seb = parent_entity(seb);
-		}
+	while (sea->cfs_rq->tg != seb->cfs_rq->tg) {
+		int sea_depth = sea->depth;
+		int seb_depth = seb->depth;
 
-		delta = (s64)(sea->vruntime - seb->vruntime);
-		goto out;
+		if (sea_depth >= seb_depth)
+			sea = parent_entity(sea);
+		if (sea_depth <= seb_depth)
+			seb = parent_entity(seb);
 	}
 
-	/* crosscpu: compare root level se's vruntime to decide priority */
-	while (sea->parent)
-		sea = sea->parent;
-	while (seb->parent)
-		seb = seb->parent;
+	se_fi_update(sea, rq->core->core_forceidle_seq, in_fi);
+	se_fi_update(seb, rq->core->core_forceidle_seq, in_fi);
 
 	cfs_rqa = sea->cfs_rq;
 	cfs_rqb = seb->cfs_rq;
@@ -520,7 +514,7 @@ bool cfs_prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b)
 	/* normalize vruntime WRT their rq's base */
 	delta = (s64)(sea->vruntime - seb->vruntime) +
 		(s64)(cfs_rqb->min_vruntime_fi - cfs_rqa->min_vruntime_fi);
-out:
+
 	return delta > 0;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
@@ -10929,8 +10923,6 @@ static void core_sched_deactivate_fair(struct rq *rq)
  */
 static void resched_forceidle_sibling(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se)
 {
-	int cpu = cpu_of(rq), sibling_cpu;
-
 	/*
 	 * If runqueue has only one task which used up its slice and if the
 	 * sibling is forced idle, then trigger schedule to give forced idle
@@ -10944,23 +10936,9 @@ static void resched_forceidle_sibling(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *se)
 	 * forced idle cpu has atleast MIN_NR_TASKS_DURING_FORCEIDLE - 1 tasks
 	 * and use that to check if we need to give up the cpu.
 	 */
-	if (rq->cfs.nr_running > 1 ||
-	    !__entity_slice_used(se, MIN_NR_TASKS_DURING_FORCEIDLE))
-		return;
-
-	for_each_cpu(sibling_cpu, cpu_smt_mask(cpu)) {
-		struct rq *sibling_rq;
-		if (sibling_cpu == cpu)
-			continue;
-		if (cpu_is_offline(sibling_cpu))
-			continue;
-
-		sibling_rq = cpu_rq(sibling_cpu);
-		if (sibling_rq->core_forceidle) {
-			resched_curr(rq);
-			break;
-		}
-	}
+	if (rq->core->core_forceidle && rq->cfs.nr_running == 1 &&
+	    __entity_slice_used(se, MIN_NR_TASKS_DURING_FORCEIDLE))
+		resched_curr(rq);
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -11102,6 +11080,41 @@ static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se)
 		update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
 	}
 }
+static void se_fi_update(struct sched_entity *se, unsigned int fi_seq, bool forceidle)
+{
+	bool root = true;
+	long old, new;
+
+	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
+		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+		if (forceidle) {
+			if (cfs_rq->forceidle_seq == fi_seq)
+				break;
+			cfs_rq->forceidle_seq = fi_seq;
+		}
+
+		if (root) {
+			old = cfs_rq->min_vruntime_fi;
+			new = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+			root = false;
+			trace_printk("cfs_rq(min_vruntime_fi) %Lu->%Lu\n",
+				     old, new);
+		}
+
+		cfs_rq->min_vruntime_fi = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+	}
+}
+
+void task_vruntime_update(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool in_fi)
+{
+	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
+
+	if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
+		return;
+
+	se_fi_update(se, rq->core->core_forceidle_seq, in_fi);
+}
+
 #else
 static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se) { }
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 45c8ce5c2333..74ad557d551e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -497,9 +497,13 @@ struct cfs_rq {
 	unsigned int		nr_running;
 	unsigned int		h_nr_running;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
+	unsigned int		forceidle_seq;
+	u64			min_vruntime_fi;
+#endif
+
 	u64			exec_clock;
 	u64			min_vruntime;
-	u64			min_vruntime_fi;
 #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
 	u64			min_vruntime_copy;
 #endif
@@ -974,7 +978,6 @@ struct rq {
 	unsigned int		core_enabled;
 	unsigned int		core_sched_seq;
 	struct rb_root		core_tree;
-	bool			core_forceidle;
 	unsigned char		core_pause_pending;
 	unsigned int		core_this_irq_nest;
 
@@ -982,6 +985,8 @@ struct rq {
 	unsigned int		core_task_seq;
 	unsigned int		core_pick_seq;
 	unsigned long		core_cookie;
+	unsigned int		core_forceidle;
+	unsigned int		core_forceidle_seq;
 	unsigned int		core_irq_nest;
 #endif
 };
@@ -1061,6 +1066,8 @@ extern void queue_core_balance(struct rq *rq);
 void sched_core_add(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
 void sched_core_remove(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
 
+bool cfs_prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool fi);
+
 #else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
 
 static inline bool sched_core_enabled(struct rq *rq)
@@ -2549,7 +2556,7 @@ unsigned long scale_irq_capacity(unsigned long util, unsigned long irq, unsigned
 #define perf_domain_span(pd) NULL
 #endif
 
-bool cfs_prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b);
+bool cfs_prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool fi);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 extern struct static_key_false sched_energy_present;

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-31 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-20  1:43 [PATCH v8 -tip 00/26] Core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 01/26] sched: Wrap rq::lock access Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 02/26] sched: Introduce sched_class::pick_task() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-22  7:59   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-22 15:25     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-23  5:25       ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-23 21:47         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-24  2:48           ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-24 11:10             ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-10-24 12:27               ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-10-24 23:48                 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-26  9:01                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-27  3:17                   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-27 14:19                   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-27 15:23                     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-27 14:14                 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 03/26] sched: Core-wide rq->lock Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26 11:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-27 16:27     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 04/26] sched/fair: Add a few assertions Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 05/26] sched: Basic tracking of matching tasks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 06/26] sched: Add core wide task selection and scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-23 13:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 13:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 17:57       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-23 19:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 21:31           ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-26  8:28             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-27 16:58               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-26  9:31             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-05 18:50               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-05 22:07                 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-23 15:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 17:59     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 07/26] sched/fair: Fix forced idle sibling starvation corner case Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 08/26] sched/fair: Snapshot the min_vruntime of CPUs on force idle Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-28 15:29     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-28 18:39     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-29 16:59     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-29 18:24     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-29 18:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30  2:36         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-30  2:42           ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-30  8:41             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-31 21:41               ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 09/26] sched: Trivial forced-newidle balancer Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 10/26] sched: migration changes for core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 11/26] irq_work: Cleanup Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 12/26] arch/x86: Add a new TIF flag for untrusted tasks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 13/26] kernel/entry: Add support for core-wide protection of kernel-mode Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  3:41   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-03  0:20     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-22  5:48   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-03  0:50     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-30 10:29   ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-03  1:20     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-06 16:57       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-06 17:43         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-06 18:07           ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-10  9:35       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-10 22:42         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-16 10:08           ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:50             ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-16 15:43               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 14/26] entry/idle: Enter and exit kernel protection during idle entry and exit Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 15/26] entry/kvm: Protect the kernel when entering from guest Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 16/26] sched: cgroup tagging interface for core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 17/26] sched: Split the cookie and setup per-task cookie on fork Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-04 22:30   ` chris hyser
2020-11-05 14:49     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-09 23:30     ` chris hyser
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 18/26] sched: Add a per-thread core scheduling interface Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 19/26] sched: Add a second-level tag for nested CGroup usecase Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-31  0:42   ` Josh Don
2020-11-03  2:54     ` Joel Fernandes
     [not found]   ` <6c07e70d-52f2-69ff-e1fa-690cd2c97f3d@linux.intel.com>
2020-11-05 15:52     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 20/26] sched: Release references to the per-task cookie on exit Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-04 21:50   ` chris hyser
2020-11-05 15:46     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 21/26] sched: Handle task addition to CGroup Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 22/26] sched/debug: Add CGroup node for printing group cookie if SCHED_DEBUG Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 23/26] kselftest: Add tests for core-sched interface Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-30 22:20   ` [PATCH] sched: Change all 4 space tabs to actual tabs John B. Wyatt IV
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 24/26] sched: Move core-scheduler interfacing code to a new file Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26  1:05   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-03  2:58     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 25/26] Documentation: Add core scheduling documentation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  3:36   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-12 16:11     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 26/26] sched: Debug bits Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-30 13:26 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 00/26] Core scheduling Ning, Hongyu
2020-11-06  2:58   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-06 17:54     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-09  6:04       ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-06 20:55 ` [RFT for v9] (Was Re: [PATCH v8 -tip 00/26] Core scheduling) Joel Fernandes
2020-11-13  9:22   ` Ning, Hongyu
2020-11-13 10:01     ` Ning, Hongyu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201031214111.GA2798587@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=OWeisse@umich.edu \
    --cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
    --cc=agata.gruza@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.intel@gmail.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
    --cc=chris.hyser@oracle.com \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=derkling@google.com \
    --cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
    --cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=jsbarnes@google.com \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kerrnel@google.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=naravamudan@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    --cc=viremana@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome