From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>,
James Clark <James.Clark@arm.com>, Al Grant <Al.Grant@arm.com>,
Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 20/21] perf arm_spe: Decode memory tagging properties
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 14:51:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201103065101.GE13232@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201102162519.GA6882@arm.com>
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 04:25:36PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 02:57:23AM +0000, Leo Yan wrote:
> > From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> >
> > When SPE records a physical address, it can additionally tag the event
> > with information from the Memory Tagging architecture extension.
> >
> > Decode the two additional fields in the SPE event payload.
> >
> > [leoy: Refined patch to use predefined macros]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c | 6 +++++-
> > tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > index 3fca65e9cbbf..9ec3057de86f 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > @@ -371,6 +371,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pkt_desc_addr(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet,
> > char *buf, size_t buf_len)
> > {
> > int ns, el, idx = packet->index;
> > + int ch, pat;
> > u64 payload = packet->payload;
> > int err = 0;
> >
> > @@ -388,9 +389,12 @@ static int arm_spe_pkt_desc_addr(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet,
> > "VA 0x%llx", payload);
> > case SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_INDEX_DATA_PHYS:
> > ns = !!SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_NS(payload);
> > + ch = !!SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_CH(payload);
> > + pat = SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_PAT(payload);
> > payload = SPE_ADDR_PKT_ADDR_GET_BYTES_0_6(payload);
> > return arm_spe_pkt_snprintf(&err, &buf, &buf_len,
> > - "PA 0x%llx ns=%d", payload, ns);
> > + "PA 0x%llx ns=%d ch=%d, pat=%x",
>
> Nit: given that this data is all closely related, do we really want the
> extra comma here?
No reason for adding comma. Will remove it.
> (Note, I am not familiar with how this text is consumed, so if there are
> other reasons why the comma is needed then that's probably fine.)
>
> > + payload, ns, ch, pat);
> > default:
> > return 0;
> > }
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > index 7032fc141ad4..1ad14885c2a1 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ struct arm_spe_pkt {
> >
> > #define SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_NS(v) (((v) & BIT_ULL(63)) >> 63)
> > #define SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_EL(v) (((v) & GENMASK_ULL(62, 61)) >> 61)
> > +#define SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_CH(v) (((v) & BIT_ULL(62)) >> 62)
> > +#define SPE_ADDR_PKT_GET_PAT(v) (((v) & GENMASK_ULL(59, 56)) >> 56)
>
> These seem to match the spec.
>
> With or without addressing the nit above:
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Thanks for reviewing.
> [...]
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-30 2:57 [PATCH v6 00/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor decoding & dumping flow Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] perf arm-spe: Include bitops.h for BIT() macro Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] perf arm-spe: Fix a typo in comment Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor payload size calculation Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 04/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor arm_spe_get_events() Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] perf arm-spe: Fix packet length handling Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor printing string to buffer Leo Yan
2020-11-02 15:50 ` André Przywara
2020-11-03 2:39 ` Leo Yan
2020-11-06 1:58 ` Leo Yan
2020-11-02 17:06 ` Dave Martin
2020-11-03 6:40 ` Leo Yan
2020-11-03 10:13 ` André Przywara
2020-11-03 12:13 ` Dave Martin
2020-11-04 8:29 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor packet header parsing Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_addr() Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor address packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] perf arm_spe: Fixup top byte for data virtual address Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor context packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_counter() Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor counter packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_event() Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor event type handling Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] perf arm-spe: Remove size condition checking for events Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_op_type() Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] perf arm-spe: Refactor operation packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] perf arm-spe: Add more sub classes for operation packet Leo Yan
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] perf arm_spe: Decode memory tagging properties Leo Yan
2020-11-02 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2020-11-03 6:51 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2020-11-03 12:14 ` Dave Martin
2020-10-30 2:57 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] perf arm-spe: Add support for ARMv8.3-SPE Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201103065101.GE13232@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s \
--to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=Al.Grant@arm.com \
--cc=Andre.Przywara@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=James.Clark@arm.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®