From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BD6C2D0A3 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 16:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1C420786 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 16:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729737AbgKDQGz (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:06:55 -0500 Received: from mail.monom.org ([188.138.9.77]:36944 "EHLO mail.monom.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727070AbgKDQGz (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:06:55 -0500 Received: from mail.monom.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filter.mynetwork.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F24500609; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:06:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [94.31.100.251]) by mail.monom.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F848500596; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:06:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:06:50 +0100 From: Daniel Wagner To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.10-rc2-rt4 Message-ID: <20201104160650.b63zqof74wohgpa2@beryllium.lan> References: <20201103195731.erjkgyzxzzjylhui@linutronix.de> <20201104103809.bhl2iorbwv6xowtw@beryllium.lan> <20201104104617.ueefmpdou4t3t2ce@linutronix.de> <20201104111948.vpykh3ptmysqhmve@beryllium.lan> <20201104124746.74jdsig3dffomv3k@beryllium.lan> <20201104130930.llx56gtqt532h7c7@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201104130930.llx56gtqt532h7c7@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:09:30PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Could you figure out if the arm64 thingy started with -rt4 or was > already in rt3? I wrote a quick and dirty script to extract the data from my logs to see if the regression might be older then I remembered. I filtered out the obviously wrong configured runs (e.g !RT). It looks like the first recorded outlier is around 5.9.0-rt16. Does this already help or do you want me to bissect it down? rpi3 signaltest 5.4.59-rt36 382 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 220.00 382 0_signaltest t0-avg-latency : pass 47.00 382 0_signaltest t0-min-latency : pass 20.00 rpi3 signaltest 5.6.19-rt12 368 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 221.00 368 0_signaltest t0-avg-latency : pass 45.00 368 0_signaltest t0-min-latency : pass 21.00 rpi3 signaltest 5.9.0-rc8-rt12 813 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 214.00 813 0_signaltest t0-avg-latency : pass 45.00 813 0_signaltest t0-min-latency : pass 20.00 rpi3 signaltest 5.9.0-rc8-rt12 874 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 217.00 874 0_signaltest t0-avg-latency : pass 45.00 874 0_signaltest t0-min-latency : pass 20.00 rpi3 signaltest 5.9.0-rt16 963 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 321.00 963 0_signaltest t0-avg-latency : pass 47.00 963 0_signaltest t0-min-latency : pass 21.00 rpi3 signaltest 5.9.1-rt19 1038 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 341.00 1038 0_signaltest t0-avg-latency : pass 46.00 1038 0_signaltest t0-min-latency : pass 20.00 rpi3 signaltest 5.9.1-rt20 1079 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 318.00 1079 0_signaltest t0-avg-latency : pass 47.00 1079 0_signaltest t0-min-latency : pass 21.00 rpi3 signaltest 5.10.0-rc1-rt1 1118 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 415.00 1118 0_signaltest t0-avg-latency : pass 53.00 1118 0_signaltest t0-min-latency : pass 23.00 rpi3 signaltest 5.10.0-rc2-rt4 1163 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 340.00 1163 0_signaltest t0-avg-latency : pass 53.00 1163 0_signaltest t0-min-latency : pass 24.00