From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, ouwen210@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/fair: prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:50:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110165015.GM2594@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201029161824.26389-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 05:18:24PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> During fast wakeup path, scheduler always check whether local or prev cpus
> are good candidates for the task before looking for other cpus in the
> domain. With
> commit b7a331615d25 ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU capacity wakeup scan")
> the heterogenous system gains a dedicated path but doesn't try to reuse
> prev cpu whenever possible. If the previous cpu is idle and belong to the
> LLC domain, we should check it 1st before looking for another cpu because
> it stays one of the best candidate and this also stabilizes task placement
> on the system.
>
> This change aligns asymmetric path behavior with symmetric one and reduces
> cases where the task migrates across all cpus of the sd_asym_cpucapacity
> domains at wakeup.
>
> This change does not impact normal EAS mode but only the overloaded case or
> when EAS is not used.
>
> - On hikey960 with performance governor (EAS disable)
>
> ./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
> mainline w/ patch
> # migrations 999364 0
> ops/sec 149313(+/-0.28%) 182587(+/- 0.40) +22%
>
> - On hikey with performance governor
>
> ./perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
> mainline w/ patch
> # migrations 0 0
> ops/sec 47721(+/-0.76%) 47899(+/- 0.56) +0.4%
>
> According to test on hikey, the patch doesn't impact symmetric system
> compared to current implementation (only tested on arm64)
>
> Also read the uclamped value of task's utilization at most twice instead
> instead each time we compare task's utilization with cpu's capacity.
>
> Fixes: b7a331615d25 ("sched/fair: Add asymmetric CPU capacity wakeup scan")
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> ---
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-29 16:18 Vincent Guittot
2020-11-03 15:36 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-11-10 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-11-11 8:23 ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/fair: Prefer " tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201110165015.GM2594@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=ouwen210@hotmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®