From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/topology: Warn when NUMA diameter > 2
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:43:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110184300.15673-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> (raw)
NUMA topologies where the shortest path between some two nodes requires
three or more hops (i.e. diameter > 2) end up being misrepresented in the
scheduler topology structures.
This is currently detected when booting a kernel with CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y
+ sched_debug on the cmdline, although this will only yield a warning about
sched_group spans not matching sched_domain spans:
ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
Add an explicit warning for that case, triggered regardless of
CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG, and decorate it with an appropriate comment.
The topology described in the comment can be booted up on QEMU by appending
the following to your usual QEMU incantation:
-smp cores=4 \
-numa node,cpus=0,nodeid=0 -numa node,cpus=1,nodeid=1, \
-numa node,cpus=2,nodeid=2, -numa node,cpus=3,nodeid=3, \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=20, -numa dist,src=0,dst=2,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=3,val=40, -numa dist,src=1,dst=2,val=20, \
-numa dist,src=1,dst=3,val=30, -numa dist,src=2,dst=3,val=20
A somewhat more realistic topology (6-node mesh) with the same affliction
can be conjured with:
-smp cores=6 \
-numa node,cpus=0,nodeid=0 -numa node,cpus=1,nodeid=1, \
-numa node,cpus=2,nodeid=2, -numa node,cpus=3,nodeid=3, \
-numa node,cpus=4,nodeid=4, -numa node,cpus=5,nodeid=5, \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=20, -numa dist,src=0,dst=2,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=3,val=40, -numa dist,src=0,dst=4,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=5,val=20, \
-numa dist,src=1,dst=2,val=20, -numa dist,src=1,dst=3,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=1,dst=4,val=20, -numa dist,src=1,dst=5,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=2,dst=3,val=20, -numa dist,src=2,dst=4,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=2,dst=5,val=40, \
-numa dist,src=3,dst=4,val=20, -numa dist,src=3,dst=5,val=30, \
-numa dist,src=4,dst=5,val=20
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/jhjtux5edo2.mognet@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/topology.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 90f3e5558fa2..b296c1c6b961 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -675,6 +675,7 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
struct sched_domain *tmp;
+ int numa_distance = 0;
/* Remove the sched domains which do not contribute to scheduling. */
for (tmp = sd; tmp; ) {
@@ -706,6 +707,38 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
sd->child = NULL;
}
+ for (tmp = sd; tmp; tmp = tmp->parent)
+ numa_distance += !!(tmp->flags & SD_NUMA);
+
+ /*
+ * FIXME: Diameter >=3 is misrepresented.
+ *
+ * Smallest diameter=3 topology is:
+ *
+ * node 0 1 2 3
+ * 0: 10 20 30 40
+ * 1: 20 10 20 30
+ * 2: 30 20 10 20
+ * 3: 40 30 20 10
+ *
+ * 0 --- 1 --- 2 --- 3
+ *
+ * NUMA-3 0-3 N/A N/A 0-3
+ * groups: {0-2},{1-3} {1-3},{0-2}
+ *
+ * NUMA-2 0-2 0-3 0-3 1-3
+ * groups: {0-1},{1-3} {0-2},{2-3} {1-3},{0-1} {2-3},{0-2}
+ *
+ * NUMA-1 0-1 0-2 1-3 2-3
+ * groups: {0},{1} {1},{2},{0} {2},{3},{1} {3},{2}
+ *
+ * NUMA-0 0 1 2 3
+ *
+ * The NUMA-2 groups for nodes 0 and 3 are obviously buggered, as the
+ * group span isn't a subset of the domain span.
+ */
+ WARN_ONCE(numa_distance > 2, "Shortest NUMA path spans too many nodes\n");
+
sched_domain_debug(sd, cpu);
rq_attach_root(rq, rd);
--
2.27.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 18:43 Valentin Schneider [this message]
2020-11-11 8:43 ` Mel Gorman
2020-11-11 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201110184300.15673-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®