From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3E6C2D0E4 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A6A216FD for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="jVNCypw4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727395AbgKLV4G (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:56:06 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:49492 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727249AbgKLV4F (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:56:05 -0500 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ACLu0EY010957; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:56:00 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1605218160; bh=vZeuvlVCxBHj41lGZcfVpWofJ2yUXkbd5bHCA2deX1k=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=jVNCypw4Fvue8pTZQgVBHHe51fWMGqciGKTEKcAEFH+RMBOg2wk/DuMxKWJt74OHK 00/QmEBavmh30NfkSJQTsYEfy9FdQvZMvn2IA7lX1GkBbGMLxOf08asRdjJZuZJ3Lm etSo2UJwy9yaHs5HYUhWH1hsxsyG1MbybQb2jNzg= Received: from DLEE104.ent.ti.com (dlee104.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.34]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0ACLu0Re024449 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:56:00 -0600 Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) by DLEE104.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:56:00 -0600 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:56:00 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ACLu0Fl096988; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:56:00 -0600 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:56:00 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Lokesh Vutla CC: Peter Ujfalusi , Yuti Amonkar , Santosh Shilimkar , Sekhar Nori , , Jyri Sarha , Tero Kristo , Tomi Valkeinen , Swapnil Jakhade , Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: Kconfig: Drop ARM64 SoC specific configs Message-ID: <20201112215600.npr4g24gt4tvc5tm@kahuna> References: <20201026170624.24241-1-nm@ti.com> <20201026190808.im4nb32jn4rd3xhu@crayon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20201026190808.im4nb32jn4rd3xhu@crayon> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14:08-20201026, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 23:30-20201026, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > [..] > > ➜ linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC > > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:961:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC=y > > drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:7:config ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC > > ➜ linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC > > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:962:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC=y > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/Kconfig:16: depends on ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC || > > COMPILE_TEST > > drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:12:config ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC > > > > > > I see drm bridge Kconfig is cleaned[0]. Please clean the defconfig as well. > > > > [0] > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/ > > > > Yes, the defconfig patches have to be queued up in a different queue, > Lets see where the two patches fall and will post the defconfig > updates as well. Santosh, https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/ looks available in next now. Can we queue this patch[1] up for 5.11 window? Depending on your preference, I can carry the defconfig patch[2] (to prevent merge dependencies, might be good to get an immutable tag) OR you can pick the defconfig patch up that cleans after removing the symbol. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026170624.24241-1-nm@ti.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201112215438.31432-1-nm@ti.com/ -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D