From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
qperret@google.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 0/3] condition EAS enablement on FI support
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:01:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201118140141.GT3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201118114233.GB9782@arm.com>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:42:34AM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Tuesday 27 Oct 2020 at 18:07:10 (+0000), Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> > Given the maturity gained by cpufreq-based Frequency Invariance (FI)
> > support following the patches at [1], this series conditions Energy
> > Aware Scheduling (EAS) enablement on a frequency invariant system.
> >
> > Currently, EAS can be enabled on a system without FI support, leading
> > to incorrect (energy-wise) task placements. As no warning is emitted,
> > it could take some debugging effort to track the behavior back to the
> > lack of FI support; this series changes that by disabling EAS
> > (and advertising it) when FI support is missing.
> >
> > The series is structured as follows:
> > - 1/3 - create function that can rebuild the scheduling and EAS'
> > performance domains if EAS' initial conditions change
> > - 2/3 - arm64: rebuild scheduling and performance domains in the
> > case of late, counter-driven FI initialisation.
> > - 3/3 - condition EAS enablement on FI support
> >
> > RESEND v2: rebase and retest on v5.10-rc1
> >
>
> This still applies nicely on v5.10-rc4.
>
> Peter, given that 1/3 and 2/3 are acked, do you think there's anything
> else that needs to be done for this?
I'll take it, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-18 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-27 18:07 Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-27 18:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/3] sched/topology,schedutil: wrap sched domains rebuild Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-30 15:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-05 14:03 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-11-20 12:34 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/topology,schedutil: Wrap " tip-bot2 for Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-27 18:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 2/3] arm64: rebuild sched domains on invariance status changes Ionela Voinescu
2020-11-10 17:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-20 12:34 ` [tip: sched/core] arm64: Rebuild " tip-bot2 for Ionela Voinescu
2020-10-27 18:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 3/3] sched/topology: condition EAS enablement on FIE support Ionela Voinescu
2020-11-20 12:34 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/topology: Condition " tip-bot2 for Ionela Voinescu
2020-11-18 11:42 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 0/3] condition EAS enablement on FI support Ionela Voinescu
2020-11-18 14:01 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201118140141.GT3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®