From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Deadlock cpuctx_mutex / pmus_lock / &mm->mmap_lock#2
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:19:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201119141914.GO3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160579231162.30679.12645532537616868812@build.alporthouse.com>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 01:25:11PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Peter Zijlstra (2020-11-19 13:02:44)
> >
> > Chris, I suspect this is due to i915 calling stop machine with all sorts
> > of locks held. Is there anything to be done about this? stop_machine()
> > is really nasty to begin with.
> >
> > What problem is it typing to solve?
>
> If there is any concurrent access through a PCI bar (that is exported to
> userspace via mmap) as the GTT is updated, results in undefined HW
> behaviour (where that is not limited to users writing to other system
> pages).
>
> stop_machine() is the most foolproof method we know that works.
Sorry, I don't understand. It tries to do what? And why does it need to
do that holding locks.
Really, this is very bad form.
> This particular cycle is easy to break by moving the copy_to_user to
> after releasing perf_event_ctx_unlock in perf_read().
The splat in question is about the ioctl()s, but yeah that too. Not sure
how easy that is. I'm also not sure that'll solve your problem,
cpu_hotplug_lock is a big lock, there's tons of stuff inside.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-18 23:04 Heiner Kallweit
2020-11-19 13:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-19 13:25 ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-19 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-11-19 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-19 15:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201119141914.GO3121392@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®