From: Tyler Hicks <code@tyhicks.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Remove bogus __user annotations
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 09:35:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120153559.GA4119@sequoia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201120015913.1375667-1-jannh@google.com>
Hey Jann - Thanks for cleaning this up!
On 2020-11-20 02:59:13, Jann Horn wrote:
> Buffers that are passed to read_actions_logged() and write_actions_logged()
> are in kernel memory; the sysctl core takes care of copying from/to
> userspace.
>
> Fixes: 0ddec0fc8900 ("seccomp: Sysctl to configure actions that are allowed to be logged")
After tracing back through the code, I was struggling to understand why
I thought the __user annotation was needed back then. It turns out that
__user was correct when I wrote 0ddec0fc8900 and that the Fixes tag
should be changed to this:
Fixes: 32927393dc1c ("sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler")
If you agree, please adjust and resubmit with:
Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <code@tyhicks.com>
Thank you!
Tyler
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> ---
> kernel/seccomp.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
> index 8ad7a293255a..c2bff3561846 100644
> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
> @@ -1968,7 +1968,7 @@ static bool seccomp_actions_logged_from_names(u32 *actions_logged, char *names)
> return true;
> }
>
> -static int read_actions_logged(struct ctl_table *ro_table, void __user *buffer,
> +static int read_actions_logged(struct ctl_table *ro_table, void *buffer,
> size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> char names[sizeof(seccomp_actions_avail)];
> @@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ static int read_actions_logged(struct ctl_table *ro_table, void __user *buffer,
> return proc_dostring(&table, 0, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> }
>
> -static int write_actions_logged(struct ctl_table *ro_table, void __user *buffer,
> +static int write_actions_logged(struct ctl_table *ro_table, void *buffer,
> size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos, u32 *actions_logged)
> {
> char names[sizeof(seccomp_actions_avail)];
>
> base-commit: 4d02da974ea85a62074efedf354e82778f910d82
> --
> 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-20 1:59 Jann Horn
2020-11-20 15:35 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
2020-11-20 15:45 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201120153559.GA4119@sequoia \
--to=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®