mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kcsan: Avoid scheduler recursion by using non-instrumented preempt_{disable,enable}()
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:08:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201123160823.GC2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123155746.GA2203226@elver.google.com>

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> Let me know what you prefer.
> 

> @@ -288,27 +288,19 @@ static u32 kcsan_prandom_u32_max(u32 ep_ro)
>  	u32 res;
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * Avoid recursion with scheduler by disabling KCSAN because
> +	 * preempt_enable_notrace() will still call into scheduler code.
>  	 */
> +	kcsan_disable_current();
>  	preempt_disable_notrace();
>  	state = raw_cpu_ptr(&kcsan_rand_state);
>  	res = prandom_u32_state(state);
> +	preempt_enable_notrace();
> +	kcsan_enable_current_nowarn();
>  
>  	return (u32)(((u64) res * ep_ro) >> 32);
>  }

This is much preferred over the other. The thing with _no_resched is that
you can miss a preemption for an unbounded amount of time, which is bad.

The _only_ valid use of _no_resched is when there's a call to schedule()
right after it.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-23 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-23 13:23 Marco Elver
2020-11-23 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-23 15:17   ` Marco Elver
2020-11-23 15:57     ` Marco Elver
2020-11-23 16:08       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-11-23 19:12         ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201123160823.GC2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®