From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EB4C2D0E4 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556BC208FE for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731109AbgKXJSz (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 04:18:55 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:53538 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729476AbgKXJSy (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 04:18:54 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 1F1F967373; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:18:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:18:52 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] LICENSES: Add the CC-BY-4.0 license Message-ID: <20201124091852.GB11695@lst.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:00:01AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > For context: Patch 2 of this series adds a text to the Documentation/ directory > which (for now) uses "GPL-2.0+ OR CC-BY-4.0", as I want to make it easy and > attractive for others to base their work on it. I'm not strongly attached to > CC-BY-4.0, but it seemed like the best choice: it's designed for such usage and > afaics better than using MIT for text files. And you've not Cced me on that patch 2 or patch 3, which makes Ccing me on this pretty useless as I can't judge the context.