From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, kpsingh@chromium.org, revest@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add a bpf_kallsyms_lookup helper
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:07:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201129010705.7djnqmztkjhqlrdt@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201126165748.1748417-1-revest@google.com>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 05:57:47PM +0100, Florent Revest wrote:
> This helper exposes the kallsyms_lookup function to eBPF tracing
> programs. This can be used to retrieve the name of the symbol at an
> address. For example, when hooking into nf_register_net_hook, one can
> audit the name of the registered netfilter hook and potentially also
> the name of the module in which the symbol is located.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@google.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 16 +++++++++++++
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 16 +++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index c3458ec1f30a..670998635eac 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -3817,6 +3817,21 @@ union bpf_attr {
> * The **hash_algo** is returned on success,
> * **-EOPNOTSUP** if IMA is disabled or **-EINVAL** if
> * invalid arguments are passed.
> + *
> + * long bpf_kallsyms_lookup(u64 address, char *symbol, u32 symbol_size, char *module, u32 module_size)
> + * Description
> + * Uses kallsyms to write the name of the symbol at *address*
> + * into *symbol* of size *symbol_sz*. This is guaranteed to be
> + * zero terminated.
> + * If the symbol is in a module, up to *module_size* bytes of
> + * the module name is written in *module*. This is also
> + * guaranteed to be zero-terminated. Note: a module name
> + * is always shorter than 64 bytes.
> + * Return
> + * On success, the strictly positive length of the full symbol
> + * name, If this is greater than *symbol_size*, the written
> + * symbol is truncated.
> + * On error, a negative value.
Looks like debug-only helper.
I cannot think of a way to use in production code.
What program suppose to do with that string?
Do string compare? BPF side doesn't have a good way to do string manipulations.
If you really need to print a symbolic name for a given address
I'd rather extend bpf_trace_printk() to support %pS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-29 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-26 16:57 Florent Revest
2020-11-26 16:57 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_kallsyms_lookup test Florent Revest
2020-12-02 0:57 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-27 2:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add a bpf_kallsyms_lookup helper KP Singh
2020-11-27 9:25 ` Florent Revest
2020-11-27 9:27 ` Florent Revest
2020-11-27 7:35 ` Yonghong Song
2020-11-27 9:20 ` Florent Revest
2020-11-27 11:20 ` KP Singh
2020-11-27 16:09 ` Yonghong Song
2020-12-02 0:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-02 20:32 ` Florent Revest
2020-12-02 21:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-12-11 14:40 ` Florent Revest
2020-12-14 6:47 ` Yonghong Song
2020-12-17 15:31 ` Florent Revest
2020-12-17 17:26 ` Yonghong Song
2020-12-18 3:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-12-18 4:39 ` Yonghong Song
2020-12-18 18:53 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-18 20:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-12-18 20:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-22 20:38 ` Florent Revest
2020-12-22 20:52 ` Florent Revest
2020-12-22 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-22 20:17 ` Florent Revest
2020-12-23 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02 0:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-27 17:20 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-27 17:20 ` [RFC PATCH] bpf: bpf_kallsyms_lookup_proto can be static kernel test robot
2020-11-29 1:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2020-11-30 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add a bpf_kallsyms_lookup helper Florent Revest
2020-12-01 2:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-12-01 20:25 ` Florent Revest
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201129010705.7djnqmztkjhqlrdt@ast-mbp \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=revest@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®