From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: Remove 'running from the wrong CPU' warning
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:19:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130101921.52754-1-dwagner@suse.de> (raw)
It's guaranteed that no request is in flight when a hctx is going
offline. This warning is only triggered when the wq's CPU is hot
plugged and the blk-mq is not synced up yet.
As this state is temporary and the request is still processed
correctly, better remove the warning as this is the fast path.
Suggested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
---
v2:
- remove the warning as suggested by Ming
v1:
- initial version
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20201126095152.19151-1-dwagner@suse.de/
block/blk-mq.c | 25 -------------------------
1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 55bcee5dc032..7e6761804f86 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1495,31 +1495,6 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
int srcu_idx;
- /*
- * We should be running this queue from one of the CPUs that
- * are mapped to it.
- *
- * There are at least two related races now between setting
- * hctx->next_cpu from blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu() and running
- * __blk_mq_run_hw_queue():
- *
- * - hctx->next_cpu is found offline in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(),
- * but later it becomes online, then this warning is harmless
- * at all
- *
- * - hctx->next_cpu is found online in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(),
- * but later it becomes offline, then the warning can't be
- * triggered, and we depend on blk-mq timeout handler to
- * handle dispatched requests to this hctx
- */
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
- cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "run queue from wrong CPU %d, hctx %s\n",
- raw_smp_processor_id(),
- cpumask_empty(hctx->cpumask) ? "inactive": "active");
- dump_stack();
- }
-
/*
* We can't run the queue inline with ints disabled. Ensure that
* we catch bad users of this early.
--
2.16.4
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 10:19 Daniel Wagner [this message]
2020-11-30 17:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-16 15:35 ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-01 2:09 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-16 15:47 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130101921.52754-1-dwagner@suse.de \
--to=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®