mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 19/23] kvm: arm64: Intercept host's CPU_ON SMCs
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 13:51:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201201135135.ejgqytcxqyiwyic6@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201127174726.4b6azdyzn5j6qmao@bogus>

Hey Sudeep,

> > +static unsigned int find_cpu_id(u64 mpidr)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int i;
> > +
> > +	/* Reject invalid MPIDRs */
> > +	if (mpidr & ~MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK)
> > +		return INVALID_CPU_ID;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
> 
> I may not have understood the flow correctly, so just asking:

> This is just called for secondaries on boot right ? 
No, secondaries are booted before KVM is initialized. kvm_arch_init() installs
the hypervisor on each core that is online at that point. That flow does not
touch this code.

But the kernel can later power down some of those cares and then this handler
is called if it tries to power them on again. You can exercise this with:

	# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu5/online
	# echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu5/online

> And the cpumasks are setup by then ? 
Cpumasks are initialized before KVM init, so yes, we could copy that
information up to EL2 and use it here. That comes down to copying `nr_cpu_ids`
because the possible set is logical IDs 0..nr_cpu_ids-1 (see smp_init_cpus()).

> Just trying to see if we can use cpu_possible_mask instead of running through
> all 256/1k/4k cpus(ofcourse based on NR_CPUS config)

I decided to keep things simple because a valid MPIDR should not need to
scan the entire array, at most the first `nr_cpu_ids` entries. An invalid MPIDR
will scan all NR_CPUS entries but that does not seem worth optimizing for.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-01 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-26 15:53 [PATCH v3 00/23] Opt-in always-on nVHE hypervisor David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:53 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] psci: Support psci_ops.get_version for v0.1 David Brazdil
2020-11-26 17:21   ` Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] psci: Accessor for configured PSCI function IDs David Brazdil
2020-11-26 17:24   ` Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 17:29     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-26 17:34   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] arm64: Make cpu_logical_map() take unsigned int David Brazdil
2020-11-26 17:28   ` Mark Rutland
2020-12-02 15:44     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] arm64: Move MAIR_EL1_SET to asm/memory.h David Brazdil
2020-11-26 17:35   ` Mark Rutland
2020-12-01 13:58     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] arm64: Extract parts of el2_setup into a macro David Brazdil
2020-11-26 18:06   ` Mark Rutland
2020-12-01 13:55     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] kvm: arm64: Add kvm-arm.protected early kernel parameter David Brazdil
2020-11-27 16:32   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-12-01 13:19     ` David Brazdil
2020-12-01 14:07       ` Mark Rutland
2020-12-01 14:43         ` David Brazdil
2020-12-01 14:58           ` Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] kvm: arm64: Initialize MAIR_EL2 using a constant David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] kvm: arm64: Remove vector_ptr param of hyp-init David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] kvm: arm64: Move hyp-init params to a per-CPU struct David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] kvm: arm64: Add .hyp.data..ro_after_init ELF section David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] kvm: arm64: Support per_cpu_ptr in nVHE hyp code David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] kvm: arm64: Create nVHE copy of cpu_logical_map David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] kvm: arm64: Add SMC handler in nVHE EL2 David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] kvm: arm64: Bootstrap PSCI " David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] kvm: arm64: Add offset for hyp VA <-> PA conversion David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] kvm: arm64: Forward safe PSCI SMCs coming from host David Brazdil
2020-11-27 10:14   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-12-02 17:49     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-27 16:51   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-12-01 13:20     ` David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] kvm: arm64: Extract __do_hyp_init into a helper function David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] kvm: arm64: Add function to enter host from KVM nVHE hyp code David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] kvm: arm64: Intercept host's CPU_ON SMCs David Brazdil
2020-11-27 17:47   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-12-01 13:51     ` David Brazdil [this message]
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] kvm: arm64: Intercept host's CPU_SUSPEND PSCI SMCs David Brazdil
2020-12-01 14:57   ` Mark Rutland
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] kvm: arm64: Keep nVHE EL2 vector installed David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] kvm: arm64: Trap host SMCs in protected mode David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] kvm: arm64: Fix EL2 mode availability checks David Brazdil
2020-11-26 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 00/23] Opt-in always-on nVHE hypervisor Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-26 16:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 16:23     ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201201135135.ejgqytcxqyiwyic6@google.com \
    --to=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®