From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] locking/urgent for v5.10-rc6
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:15:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201201181506.GM3092@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201201145519.GY2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 03:55:19PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:46:44AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > > So after having talked to Sven a bit, the thing that is happening, is
> > > that this is the one place where we take interrupts with RCU being
> > > disabled. Normally RCU is watching and all is well, except during idle.
> >
> > Isn't interrupt entry supposed to invoke rcu_irq_enter() at some point?
> > Or did this fall victim to recent optimizations?
>
> It does, but the problem is that s390 is still using
I might've been too quick there, I can't actually seem to find where
s390 does rcu_irq_enter()/exit().
Also, I'm thinking the below might just about solve the current problem.
The next problem would then be it calling TRACE_IRQS_ON after it did
rcu_irq_exit()... :/
---
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h
index 9f75d67b8c20..24d3dd482df7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ void irq_subclass_unregister(enum irq_subclass subclass);
#define irq_canonicalize(irq) (irq)
+extern __visible void ext_do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long vector);
+
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
#endif /* _ASM_IRQ_H */
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
index 26bb0603c5a1..b8e89b685038 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.S
@@ -976,16 +976,10 @@ ENTRY(ext_int_handler)
xc __PT_FLAGS(8,%r11),__PT_FLAGS(%r11)
TSTMSK __LC_CPU_FLAGS,_CIF_IGNORE_IRQ
jo .Lio_restore
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS)
- tmhh %r8,0x300
- jz 1f
- TRACE_IRQS_OFF
-1:
-#endif
xc __SF_BACKCHAIN(8,%r15),__SF_BACKCHAIN(%r15)
lgr %r2,%r11 # pass pointer to pt_regs
lghi %r3,EXT_INTERRUPT
- brasl %r14,do_IRQ
+ brasl %r14,ext_do_IRQ
j .Lio_return
ENDPROC(ext_int_handler)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
index 3514420f0259..f4a29114e9fd 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
@@ -329,3 +329,23 @@ void irq_subclass_unregister(enum irq_subclass subclass)
spin_unlock(&irq_subclass_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_subclass_unregister);
+
+noinstr void ext_do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long vector)
+{
+ bool rcu = false;
+
+ lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0);
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) && is_idle_task(current)) {
+ rcu_irq_enter();
+ rcu = true;
+ }
+ /* instrumentation_begin(); */
+
+ trace_hardirqs_off_finish();
+
+ do_IRQ(regs, vector);
+
+ /* instrumentation_end(); */
+ if (rcu)
+ rcu_irq_exit();
+}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-01 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-29 13:37 [GIT pull] irq/urgent " Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-29 13:38 ` [GIT pull] locking/urgent " Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-29 19:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-11-30 0:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-30 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30 8:23 ` Sven Schnelle
2020-11-30 12:31 ` Sven Schnelle
2020-11-30 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-11-30 19:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-12-01 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 14:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-01 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-01 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-12-01 18:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:57 ` Mark Rutland
2020-12-01 19:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:18 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-12-02 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 10:56 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-12-02 11:16 ` Mark Rutland
2020-12-02 13:46 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-12-02 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 7:48 ` Sven Schnelle
2020-12-02 7:54 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-12-02 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 10:52 ` Heiko Carstens
2020-11-30 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-12-01 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-12-02 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-29 20:06 ` pr-tracker-bot
2020-11-29 20:06 ` [GIT pull] irq/urgent " pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201201181506.GM3092@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome