From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Prevent raising SCHED_SOFTIRQ when CPU is !active
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:24:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201215092425.56d815f4@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201215104400.9435-1-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:44:00 +0100
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> wrote:
> SCHED_SOFTIRQ is raised to trigger periodic load balancing. When CPU is not
> active, CPU should not participate in load balancing.
>
> The scheduler uses nohz.idle_cpus_mask to keep track of the CPUs which can
> do idle load balancing. When bringing a CPU up the CPU is added to the mask
> when it reaches the active state, but on teardown the CPU stays in the mask
> until it goes offline and invokes sched_cpu_dying().
>
> When SCHED_SOFTIRQ is raised on a !active CPU, there might be a pending
> softirq when stopping the tick which triggers a warning in NOHZ code. The
> SCHED_SOFTIRQ can also be raised by the scheduler tick which has the same
> issue.
>
> Therefore remove the CPU from nohz.idle_cpus_mask when it is marked
> inactive and also prevent the scheduler_tick() from raising SCHED_SOFTIRQ
> after this point.
>
Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 7 ++++++-
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 +++++--
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 21b548b69455..69284dc121d3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -7492,6 +7492,12 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
> struct rq_flags rf;
> int ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Remove CPU from nohz.idle_cpus_mask to prevent participating in
> + * load balancing when not active
> + */
> + nohz_balance_exit_idle(rq);
> +
> set_cpu_active(cpu, false);
> /*
> * We've cleared cpu_active_mask, wait for all preempt-disabled and RCU
> @@ -7598,7 +7604,6 @@ int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
>
> calc_load_migrate(rq);
> update_max_interval();
> - nohz_balance_exit_idle(rq);
> hrtick_clear(rq);
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 04a3ce20da67..fd422b8eb859 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -10700,8 +10700,11 @@ static __latent_entropy void run_rebalance_domains(struct softirq_action *h)
> */
> void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
> {
> - /* Don't need to rebalance while attached to NULL domain */
> - if (unlikely(on_null_domain(rq)))
> + /*
> + * Don't need to rebalance while attached to NULL domain or
> + * runqueue CPU is not active
> + */
> + if (unlikely(on_null_domain(rq) || !cpu_active(cpu_of(rq))))
> return;
>
> if (time_after_eq(jiffies, rq->next_balance))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-15 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-15 10:44 Anna-Maria Behnsen
2020-12-15 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 14:23 ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2020-12-15 14:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-12-15 15:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 17:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-16 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-16 10:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-15 14:24 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2021-01-14 11:29 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Anna-Maria Behnsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201215092425.56d815f4@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®