From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "Guido Günther" <guido.gunther@puri.sm>
Cc: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-power <linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"angus.ainslie@puri.sm" <angus.ainslie@puri.sm>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulators: bd718x7: Add enable times
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 12:48:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216124814.GA4861@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201216124133.GA31109@bogon.m.sigxcpu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1162 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 01:41:33PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:29:20PM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > > + .enable_time = 144,
> > Where are these values obtained from? I have a feeling they might be
> > board / load specific. If this is the case - can the "regulator-enable-
> > ramp-delay" from device-tree be used instead to avoid hard-coding board
> > specific values in the driver? Although, sane defaults would probably
> > not be a bad idea - if I read code correctly then the constrains from
> > DT can be used to override these values.
> They're the 'typical values' from the data sheet and it's basically all
> about setting a default for "regulator-enable-ramp-delay" to avoid
> having every board do the same. If that's not the right thing todo let
> me know and i add these to each of our boards (which is where i
> basically started from but then figured that this would be busywork
> and every board would hit that problem).
If it's a DCDC they're *probably* generic values rather than board
specific, they tend to be more predictable as they're regulating much
more actively than LDOs.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-16 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-16 11:05 [PATCH 0/1] " Guido Günther
2020-12-16 11:05 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Guido Günther
2020-12-16 12:29 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2020-12-16 12:41 ` Guido Günther
2020-12-16 12:48 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2020-12-16 17:47 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2020-12-17 14:21 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2020-12-16 13:06 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201216124814.GA4861@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=Matti.Vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=angus.ainslie@puri.sm \
--cc=guido.gunther@puri.sm \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome