From: Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@kalray.eu>
To: Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@synopsys.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@kalray.eu>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] usb: dwc2: Try usb_get_phy_by_phandle instead of usb_get_phy
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:59:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216165935.9149-1-jmaselbas@kalray.eu> (raw)
On probe the dwc2 driver tries two path to get an usb phy, first calling
devm_phy_get() and secondly with devm_usb_get_phy().
However the current implementation of devm_phy_get() never return a valid
phy for usb-nop-xceiv. And the current implementation of devm_usb_get_phy
only check for phy that's has already been registered.
During boot, I see the dwc2 driver being probed before the usb-nop-xceiv
probe, this means that during the dwc2 probe the function devm_usb_get_phy
never finds the a phy (because it hasn't been registered yet) but never
cause the dwc2 probe to defer.
I tried to follow what is done by dwc3_core_get_phy(): if the current
device has an of_node then try to get the usb_phy by phandle instead of
using devm_usb_get_phy(). This way when the probe order is not good the
devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle() function will return -EPROBE_DEFER.
Signed-off-by: Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@kalray.eu>
--- 8< ---
A snippet of the device-tree source I am using:
&usb0 {
phys = <&usb_phy0>;
phy-names = "usb2-phy";
};
&usb_phy0 {
#phy-cells = <0>;
compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
reset-gpios = <&gpio 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
---
drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c
index db9fd4bd1a38..b58ce996add7 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/platform.c
@@ -251,7 +251,12 @@ static int dwc2_lowlevel_hw_init(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
}
if (!hsotg->phy) {
- hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy(hsotg->dev, USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
+ if (hsotg->dev->of_node)
+ i = of_property_match_string(hsotg->dev->of_node, "phy-names", "usb2-phy");
+ if (hsotg->dev->of_node && i >= 0)
+ hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(hsotg->dev, "phys", i);
+ else
+ hsotg->uphy = devm_usb_get_phy(hsotg->dev, USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
if (IS_ERR(hsotg->uphy)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(hsotg->uphy);
switch (ret) {
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-12-16 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-16 16:59 Jules Maselbas [this message]
2020-12-25 11:41 ` Artur Petrosyan
2020-12-26 13:45 ` Jules Maselbas
2020-12-29 8:17 ` Artur Petrosyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201216165935.9149-1-jmaselbas@kalray.eu \
--to=jmaselbas@kalray.eu \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hminas@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®