From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C508BC4361B for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBF822A99 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730219AbgLPWOz (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:14:55 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46854 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727796AbgLPWOz (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 17:14:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:14:10 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mark Rutland , Jens Axboe , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , pr-tracker-bot@kernel.org, Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: make _TIF_WORK_MASK bits contiguous (was: Re: [GIT PULL] TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL for all archs) Message-ID: <20201216221410.GA27159@C02TF0J2HF1T.local> References: <701d4747-bbbb-dbb4-d828-63d096fcc22a@kernel.dk> <160815345901.27795.2544235487408028611.pr-tracker-bot@kernel.org> <20201216220422.GA19075@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:06:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:04 PM Mark Rutland wrote: > > Unfortunately the merge resolution broke the build for arm64 -- could > > you please apply the fixup below? IIUC that matches what we did in > > linux-next, and builds fine locally. > > Oops. That was a bit too subtle. I didn't realize that the bits really > wanted to be contiguous, and it wasn't obvious at the point of > conflict. > > Will apply your fix asap. Thanks Linus for applying it and thanks Mark for the quick fix. I noticed it in -next before and gave Stephen my conflict resolution. -- Catalin