From: Lin Feng <linfeng23@huawei.com>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <weidong.huang@huawei.com>, <hogan.wang@huawei.com>,
<wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<ebiederm@xmission.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>,
Lin Feng <linfeng23@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/kaslr: try process e820 entries if can not get suitable regions from efi
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:53:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210105085346.995-1-linfeng23@huawei.com> (raw)
On efi64 x86_64 system, the EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY regions will not
be mapped when making EFI runtime calls. So kexec-tools can not get
these from /sys/firmware/efi/runtime-map. Then compressed boot os
can not get suitable regions in process_efi_entries and print debug
message as follow:
Physical KASLR disabled: no suitable memory region!
To enable physical kaslr with kexec, call process_e820_entries when
no suitable regions in efi memmaps.
Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linfeng23@huawei.com>
---
I find a regular of Kernel code and data placement with kexec. It
seems unsafe. The reason is showed above.
I'm not familiar with efi firmware. I wonder if there are some risks
to get regions according to e820 when there is no suitable region
in efi memmaps.
---
arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
index b92fffbe761f..dbd7244b71aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
@@ -685,6 +685,7 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
{
struct efi_info *e = &boot_params->efi_info;
bool efi_mirror_found = false;
+ bool efi_mem_region_found = false;
struct mem_vector region;
efi_memory_desc_t *md;
unsigned long pmap;
@@ -742,12 +743,13 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE))
continue;
+ efi_mem_region_found = false;
region.start = md->phys_addr;
region.size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
if (process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size))
break;
}
- return true;
+ return efi_mem_region_found;
}
#else
static inline bool
--
2.23.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-05 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-05 8:53 Lin Feng [this message]
2021-01-05 8:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-01-05 21:00 ` Arvind Sankar
2021-01-06 3:04 ` linfeng (M)
2021-03-17 2:27 ` linfeng (M)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210105085346.995-1-linfeng23@huawei.com \
--to=linfeng23@huawei.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hogan.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®