From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49057C433E9 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2624623123 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727943AbhAFRSi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 12:18:38 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60828 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727876AbhAFRSg (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 12:18:36 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B833B23159; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:17:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1609953434; bh=7I/YkDWVc6pIzLNw5c8DbbJsczboUueIol9h6z0JFJs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Am1zOcNBea//VEFHZF189rj2nHZ9j2ZRI6McUA+khq6d94DqqNk5sw//Rwb9QUg2u 7OUpPCullA8a0W0gb6FQPDW8nIYnyKh3qrReS+1EKVCbG0m8osbjmjEzK+htGT6Mpv pipo9XfLdjVXYQAMs2fXbuJhyANqxM+g96VSlQo+GePtzdZMYKg9bOMqGyPCM95faY fykkGVYIIjdkeHKwgi+nc+kHHJ4uFNv1RzOB2QQA8j/X3dVeqvTGMo4GTcGgpgp13m P/wFF15DKIO/gOdz69H2FZMkcS0vU1bx3c7GwyM8rgXGhuKmsWlmjhKCiyDyhG/81i NxRFx2atcULqg== From: paulmck@kernel.org To: rcu@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/17] torture: Maintain torture-specific set of CPUs-online books Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:17:08 -0800 Message-Id: <20210106171710.22239-15-paulmck@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.5 In-Reply-To: <20210106171532.GA20769@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> References: <20210106171532.GA20769@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Paul E. McKenney" The TREE01 rcutorture scenario intentionally creates confusion as to the number of available CPUs by specifying the "maxcpus=8 nr_cpus=43" kernel boot parameters. This can disable rcutorture's load shedding, which currently uses num_online_cpus(), which would count the extra 35 CPUs. However, the rcutorture guest OS will be provisioned with only 8 CPUs, which means that rcutorture will present full load even when all but one of the original 8 CPUs are offline. This can result in spurious errors due to extreme overloading of that single remaining CPU. This commit therefore keeps a separate set of books on the number of usable online CPUs, so that torture_num_online_cpus() is used for load shedding instead of num_online_cpus(). Note that initial sizing must use num_online_cpus() because torture_num_online_cpus() will return NR_CPUS until shortly after torture_onoff_init() is invoked. Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker [ paulmck: Apply feedback from kernel test robot. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- include/linux/torture.h | 5 +++++ kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 4 ++-- kernel/torture.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/torture.h b/include/linux/torture.h index d62d13c..0910c58 100644 --- a/include/linux/torture.h +++ b/include/linux/torture.h @@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ do { \ void verbose_torout_sleep(void); /* Definitions for online/offline exerciser. */ +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU +int torture_num_online_cpus(void); +#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */ +static inline int torture_num_online_cpus(void) { return 1; } +#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */ typedef void torture_ofl_func(void); bool torture_offline(int cpu, long *n_onl_attempts, long *n_onl_successes, unsigned long *sum_offl, int *min_onl, int *max_onl); diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c index 72fd6bb..a9c2ee7 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c @@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ static void rcu_torture_reader_do_mbchk(long myid, struct rcu_torture *rtp, struct torture_random_state *trsp) { unsigned long loops; - int noc = num_online_cpus(); + int noc = torture_num_online_cpus(); int rdrchked; int rdrchker; struct rcu_torture_reader_check *rtrcp; // Me. @@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ rcu_torture_reader(void *arg) torture_hrtimeout_us(500, 1000, &rand); lastsleep = jiffies + 10; } - while (num_online_cpus() < mynumonline && !torture_must_stop()) + while (torture_num_online_cpus() < mynumonline && !torture_must_stop()) schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ / 5); stutter_wait("rcu_torture_reader"); } while (!torture_must_stop()); diff --git a/kernel/torture.c b/kernel/torture.c index 507a20b..01e336f 100644 --- a/kernel/torture.c +++ b/kernel/torture.c @@ -175,6 +175,19 @@ static unsigned long sum_online; static int min_online = -1; static int max_online; +static int torture_online_cpus = NR_CPUS; + +/* + * Some torture testing leverages confusion as to the number of online + * CPUs. This function returns the torture-testing view of this number, + * which allows torture tests to load-balance appropriately. + */ +int torture_num_online_cpus(void) +{ + return READ_ONCE(torture_online_cpus); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(torture_num_online_cpus); + /* * Attempt to take a CPU offline. Return false if the CPU is already * offline or if it is not subject to CPU-hotplug operations. The @@ -229,6 +242,8 @@ bool torture_offline(int cpu, long *n_offl_attempts, long *n_offl_successes, *min_offl = delta; if (*max_offl < delta) *max_offl = delta; + WRITE_ONCE(torture_online_cpus, torture_online_cpus - 1); + WARN_ON_ONCE(torture_online_cpus <= 0); } return true; @@ -285,6 +300,7 @@ bool torture_online(int cpu, long *n_onl_attempts, long *n_onl_successes, *min_onl = delta; if (*max_onl < delta) *max_onl = delta; + WRITE_ONCE(torture_online_cpus, torture_online_cpus + 1); } return true; -- 2.9.5