From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1FEC43381 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1372313B for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726651AbhAFVYi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:24:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37224 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726484AbhAFVYh (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:24:37 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1049.google.com (mail-pj1-x1049.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1049]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5694AC061757 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 13:23:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1049.google.com with SMTP id q10so2770836pjg.1 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:23:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject :from:to:cc; bh=B8PYbSjV2wfSDgFPLbkumGoasg34od4IBoxCKHUJkH8=; b=apIUtTD+RBKMiifUBV/QOKCN1DEsE1JxgWgVOT6qWD8AmqEpUmb5loa4Kv4ZINPHLU c9FopF7c746VzG5HysQawa09pJBxSRVGswENI7gUizRFVTeRXnCKbN8qwo0k5DAjb9rv lsvzhjHh+BG75/8DjRDrJZukOkXaAGCb6bgp754HzFMLKjqVJFDE0UqT/ShNPrUdA4PB 4iuSzObdw+PZo8089ea8QbJzgWzef1jv7jflmTDfoywyC9c1Ef8zCWvV0MWmtoE166R5 5pH8TnwWr8lAI5IMwBvkSLDFmlGbEnNZ1CLE6G33H2TZUFmfkvxanTra2rm7849asVZe twhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=B8PYbSjV2wfSDgFPLbkumGoasg34od4IBoxCKHUJkH8=; b=cgExB4Nst4lZI2IyGi2Tz/F2NY//U+Y4Um9c+EQ9aiiL/iuO8xBcRYhSGOQvbqnJrY XkINp2T/10DwdT89H3Wf23KtJ/n/Ndd6v9LQjbkgn/FnhhgLUw5MVR7iVqxbYlXdD8rl CfGz/xR4jFqVwFp8VEpmA50TVooYB/BGZ+3ISdbOSsXb11zZTPe3/LZZckUmujHcdO6c 1yUiPvm2Jsv7QiXyS73TiHFVHL8vdRTyrkRgNlwyurDgzv37ZmVtG4aM4WGOtzJTqMxJ 2Y6+ystNU1bqCFTdZS1EzelBAYbfHqsZ2AuRl5qeQ2wuu4HAVbv8XGEIvQx8dgLjcPf0 Y2OA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wPXAxdfjKsa+Pi5KdXFzhuHn2lbVQ+M2pHTznYoBGzp9wdabp KlFdj5/BdD2XlJhT7XRNctTZYXWQyWyAgw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2tCZ3UYxiwc5oOvOFVbTW/pTurKvOM6UOaZUSA/Rl1yc3ILaQ4uytOXQR7UPwTMqhs48PU+pZ6gLOtA== Sender: "jbhayana via sendgmr" X-Received: from jbhayana.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:10:24:72f4:c0a8:42b2]) (user=jbhayana job=sendgmr) by 2002:a62:9208:0:b029:19e:a15f:169e with SMTP id o8-20020a6292080000b029019ea15f169emr5832648pfd.71.1609968236760; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 13:23:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:23:53 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20210106161233.GA44413@e120937-lin> Message-Id: <20210106212353.951807-1-jbhayana@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20210106161233.GA44413@e120937-lin> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog Subject: Reply to [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Adding support for IIO SCMI based sensors From: Jyoti Bhayana To: Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Jyoti Bhayana , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , Lukas Bulwahn Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, cristian.marussi@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, egranata@google.com, mikhail.golubev@opensynergy.com, Igor.Skalkin@opensynergy.com, Peter.hilber@opensynergy.com, ankitarora@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jonathan, Instead of adding IIO_VAL_INT_H32_L32, I am thinking of adding IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LONG or IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_64 as the scale/exponent used for min/max range can be different than the one used in resolution according to specification. I am planning to use read_avail for IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED using IIO_AVAIL_RANGE and this new IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_64 for min range,max range and resolution. Instead of two values used in IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_64 will use 4 values val_high,val_low,and val2_high and val2_low. Let me know if that is an acceptable solution. Thanks, Jyoti