mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH -tip V4 5/8] workqueue: introduce wq_unbound_online_cpumask
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:26:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111152638.2417-6-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210111152638.2417-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>

wq_unbound_online_cpumask is the cached result of cpu_online_mask with
the going-down cpu cleared before the cpu is cleared from cpu_active_mask.
It is used to track the cpu hotplug process so the creation/attachment
of unbound workers can know where it is in the process when there is
ongoing cpu hotplug and so that workqueue can cooperate with hotplug and
scheduler correctly in later patches for setting correct cpumask for
workers and break affinity initiatively.

The first usage of wq_unbound_online_cpumask is also in this patch.
wq_calc_node_cpumask() and wq_update_unbound_numa() can be simplified
a little.

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index aed08eddeb83..d01cca8e51f9 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -310,6 +310,9 @@ static bool workqueue_freezing;		/* PL: have wqs started freezing? */
 /* PL: allowable cpus for unbound wqs and work items */
 static cpumask_var_t wq_unbound_cpumask;
 
+/* PL: online cpus (cpu_online_mask with the going-down cpu cleared) */
+static cpumask_var_t wq_unbound_online_cpumask;
+
 /* CPU where unbound work was last round robin scheduled from this CPU */
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, wq_rr_cpu_last);
 
@@ -3835,12 +3838,10 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
  * wq_calc_node_cpumask - calculate a wq_attrs' cpumask for the specified node
  * @attrs: the wq_attrs of the default pwq of the target workqueue
  * @node: the target NUMA node
- * @cpu_going_down: if >= 0, the CPU to consider as offline
  * @cpumask: outarg, the resulting cpumask
  *
- * Calculate the cpumask a workqueue with @attrs should use on @node.  If
- * @cpu_going_down is >= 0, that cpu is considered offline during
- * calculation.  The result is stored in @cpumask.
+ * Calculate the cpumask a workqueue with @attrs should use on @node.
+ * The result is stored in @cpumask.
  *
  * If NUMA affinity is not enabled, @attrs->cpumask is always used.  If
  * enabled and @node has online CPUs requested by @attrs, the returned
@@ -3854,15 +3855,14 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
  * %false if equal.
  */
 static bool wq_calc_node_cpumask(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs, int node,
-				 int cpu_going_down, cpumask_t *cpumask)
+				 cpumask_t *cpumask)
 {
 	if (!wq_numa_enabled || attrs->no_numa)
 		goto use_dfl;
 
 	/* does @node have any online CPUs @attrs wants? */
 	cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask_of_node(node), attrs->cpumask);
-	if (cpu_going_down >= 0)
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_going_down, cpumask);
+	cpumask_and(cpumask, cpumask, wq_unbound_online_cpumask);
 
 	if (cpumask_empty(cpumask))
 		goto use_dfl;
@@ -3971,7 +3971,7 @@ apply_wqattrs_prepare(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 		goto out_free;
 
 	for_each_node(node) {
-		if (wq_calc_node_cpumask(new_attrs, node, -1, tmp_attrs->cpumask)) {
+		if (wq_calc_node_cpumask(new_attrs, node, tmp_attrs->cpumask)) {
 			ctx->pwq_tbl[node] = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, tmp_attrs);
 			if (!ctx->pwq_tbl[node])
 				goto out_free;
@@ -4096,7 +4096,6 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
  * wq_update_unbound_numa - update NUMA affinity of a wq for CPU hot[un]plug
  * @wq: the target workqueue
  * @cpu: the CPU coming up or going down
- * @online: whether @cpu is coming up or going down
  *
  * This function is to be called from %CPU_DOWN_PREPARE, %CPU_ONLINE and
  * %CPU_DOWN_FAILED.  @cpu is being hot[un]plugged, update NUMA affinity of
@@ -4114,11 +4113,9 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
  * affinity, it's the user's responsibility to flush the work item from
  * CPU_DOWN_PREPARE.
  */
-static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
-				   bool online)
+static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu)
 {
 	int node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
-	int cpu_off = online ? -1 : cpu;
 	struct pool_workqueue *old_pwq = NULL, *pwq;
 	struct workqueue_attrs *target_attrs;
 	cpumask_t *cpumask;
@@ -4146,7 +4143,7 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
 	 * and create a new one if they don't match.  If the target cpumask
 	 * equals the default pwq's, the default pwq should be used.
 	 */
-	if (wq_calc_node_cpumask(wq->dfl_pwq->pool->attrs, node, cpu_off, cpumask)) {
+	if (wq_calc_node_cpumask(wq->dfl_pwq->pool->attrs, node, cpumask)) {
 		if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, pwq->pool->attrs->cpumask))
 			return;
 	} else {
@@ -5106,6 +5103,7 @@ int workqueue_unbound_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	int pi;
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, wq_unbound_online_cpumask);
 
 	/* update CPU affinity of workers of unbound pools */
 	for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
@@ -5119,7 +5117,7 @@ int workqueue_unbound_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	/* update NUMA affinity of unbound workqueues */
 	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list)
-		wq_update_unbound_numa(wq, cpu, true);
+		wq_update_unbound_numa(wq, cpu);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 	return 0;
@@ -5131,8 +5129,9 @@ int workqueue_unbound_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	/* update NUMA affinity of unbound workqueues */
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, wq_unbound_online_cpumask);
 	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list)
-		wq_update_unbound_numa(wq, cpu, false);
+		wq_update_unbound_numa(wq, cpu);
 	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -5969,6 +5968,9 @@ void __init workqueue_init_early(void)
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct pool_workqueue) < __alignof__(long long));
 
+	BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&wq_unbound_online_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL));
+	cpumask_copy(wq_unbound_online_cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+
 	BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&wq_unbound_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL));
 	cpumask_copy(wq_unbound_cpumask, housekeeping_cpumask(hk_flags));
 
@@ -6065,7 +6067,7 @@ void __init workqueue_init(void)
 	}
 
 	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
-		wq_update_unbound_numa(wq, smp_processor_id(), true);
+		wq_update_unbound_numa(wq, smp_processor_id());
 		WARN(init_rescuer(wq),
 		     "workqueue: failed to create early rescuer for %s",
 		     wq->name);
-- 
2.19.1.6.gb485710b


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-11 15:26 [PATCH -tip V4 0/8] workqueue: break affinity initiatively Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-11 15:26 ` [PATCH -tip V4 1/8] workqueue: split cpuhotplug callbacks for unbound workqueue Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-11 15:26 ` [PATCH -tip V4 2/8] workqueue: set pool->attr->cpumask to workers when cpu online Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-11 15:26 ` [PATCH -tip V4 3/8] workqueue: use cpu_possible_mask instead of cpu_active_mask to break affinity Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-22 17:41   ` [tip: sched/urgent] workqueue: Use " tip-bot2 for Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-11 15:26 ` [PATCH -tip V4 4/8] workqueue: Manually break affinity on pool detachment Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-11 15:26 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2021-01-11 15:26 ` [PATCH -tip V4 6/8] workqueue: use wq_unbound_online_cpumask in restore_unbound_workers_cpumask() Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-11 15:26 ` [PATCH -tip V4 7/8] workqueue: Manually break affinity on hotplug for unbound pool Lai Jiangshan
2021-01-11 15:26 ` [PATCH -tip V4 8/8] workqueue: Fix affinity of kworkers when attaching into pool Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210111152638.2417-6-jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --to=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=cai@redhat.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.donnefort@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®