From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Resolve symbols against debug file first
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:46:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210113104618.GB1331835@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113080128.10286-1-jslaby@suse.cz>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:01:28AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> With LTO, there are symbols like these:
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libantlr4-runtime.so.4.8-4.8-1.4.x86_64.debug
> 10305: 0000000000955fa4 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT 29 Predicate.cpp.2bc410e7
>
> This comes from a runtime/debug split done by the standard way:
> objcopy --only-keep-debug $runtime $debug
> objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink=$debugfn -R .comment -R .GCC.command.line --strip-all $runtime
>
> perf currently cannot resolve such symbols (relicts of LTO), as section
> 29 exists only in the debug file (29 is .debug_info). And perf resolves
> symbols only against runtime file. This results in all symbols from such
> a library being unresolved:
> 0.38% main2 libantlr4-runtime.so.4.8 [.] 0x00000000000671e0
>
> So try resolving against the debug file first. And only if it fails (the
> section has NOBITS set), try runtime file. We can do this, as "objcopy
> --only-keep-debug" per documentation preserves all sections, but clears
> data of some of them (the runtime ones) and marks them as NOBITS.
>
> The correct result is now:
> 0.38% main2 libantlr4-runtime.so.4.8 [.] antlr4::IntStream::~IntStream
>
> Note that these LTO symbols are properly skipped anyway as they belong
> neither to *text* nor to *data* (is_label && !elf_sec__filter(&shdr,
> secstrs) is true).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> index f3577f7d72fe..a31b716fa61c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> @@ -1226,12 +1226,20 @@ int dso__load_sym(struct dso *dso, struct map *map, struct symsrc *syms_ss,
> if (sym.st_shndx == SHN_ABS)
> continue;
>
> - sec = elf_getscn(runtime_ss->elf, sym.st_shndx);
> + sec = elf_getscn(syms_ss->elf, sym.st_shndx);
> if (!sec)
> goto out_elf_end;
we iterate symbols from syms_ss, so the fix seems to be correct
to call elf_getscn on syms_ss, not on runtime_ss as we do now
I'd think this worked only when runtime_ss == syms_ss
>
> gelf_getshdr(sec, &shdr);
>
> + if (shdr.sh_type == SHT_NOBITS) {
> + sec = elf_getscn(runtime_ss->elf, sym.st_shndx);
> + if (!sec)
> + goto out_elf_end;
> +
> + gelf_getshdr(sec, &shdr);
> + }
is that fallback necessary? the symbol is from syms_ss
Namhyung, any idea?
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-13 8:01 Jiri Slaby
2021-01-13 10:46 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-01-13 11:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2021-01-14 4:54 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-01-14 11:17 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-01-15 7:37 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-01-28 10:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2021-02-03 4:28 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-02-03 19:32 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210113104618.GB1331835@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®